Annual Financial Report Year Ended 30 June 2024

ANNOUNCEMENT 

30 September 2024

MPO Announces 2024 Annual Results

Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited announces its results for the year ended 30 June 2024. The Company, which is managed by Sniper Capital Limited, holds strategic property investments in Macau.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Fund performance

•    MPO's portfolio value1 declined 8% over the year to US$152.7 million.

•    Adjusted NAV was US$ 66.1 million, which translates to US$1.07 (85 pence2) per share, a 26.9% decrease year-on-year (YoY). 

•    IFRS NAV was US$46.4 million or US$0.75 (59 pence2) per share, a 29.4% decrease YoY.

Capital management

•    As at 30 June 2024, MPO's balance sheet held assets worth a total of US$137.9 million, against combined liabilities of US$91.5 million.

•    The Company ended the financial year with a consolidated cash balance (including deposits with lenders) of US$4.8 million.

•    As at 30 June 2024, gross borrowings stood at US$82.8million, which translates to a loan-to-value ratio of 52.9%.

1 Calculation was adjusted to reflect like-for-like comparisons to 30 June 2024 due to the divestment of properties during the year.

2 Based on the Dollar/Sterling exchange rate of 1.265 on 30 June 2024.

PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS

•    The Waterside

-    13 units were sold during the financial year comprising 11 standard units, one simplex unit and one duplex unit. A further 3 units were sold subsequent to the financial year end, leaving 29 units available for sale as at end of September.

-    Since the launch of The Waterside strata sales program in Q2 2022, the Company has achieved total divestments of US$77.7 million (HK$607million) through the sale of 27 units as at end June.

-    Tenant occupancy increased from 46% to 71% YoY as of year end, albeit with a lower base of number of available units for leasing.

•    The Fountainside 

-    Two duplexes at the property have been reconfigured into three smaller units and two car-parking spaces. Occupancy permits are expected by the end of 2024 to early 2025, clearing the way for sales in Q1 2025.

-    For the four villas, marketing efforts continue with increased investor interest albeit pricing pressure remains.

•    Penha Heights

-    Since Macau's zero-COVID measures were lifted in early 2023, marketing activity for the property has been stepped up.

-    Events targeting high net worth individuals were hosted at the villa to showcase its potential.

Mark Huntley, Chairman of Macau Property Opportunities Fund, said:

"The sales achieved during the year enabled the Company's gross borrowings with banks to be reduced from US$105.6 million to US$82.8 million. With further sales completed after year-end, the Company's borrowings have fallen to US$68.9 million. The repayment of loans and the reduction of associated debt service levels has been a key objective during the year.

"We are mindful that sales velocity has been slower than we anticipated, but would stress that working within, rather than against, the market is the only means by which we can maximize returns in this environment.

"The effects of easing restrictions and reduced property taxes, lower interest rates and signs of further economic stimulus measures provide a more encouraging medium term outlook and a basis for market confidence and sentiment to improve. We will navigate through the near-term market challenges and continue looking for every opportunity to achieve our divestment objectives to repay debt and distribute capital back to our shareholders."

For more information, please visit http://www.mpofund.comfor the Company's full Annual Report 2024.

The Manager will be available to speak to analysts and the media. If you would like to arrange a call, please contact Investor Relations of Sniper Capital Limited at [email protected]. 

The Annual Report has been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism and will shortly be available for inspection at https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism  

About Macau Property Opportunities Fund

Macau Property Opportunities Fund (MPO) is a closed-end investment fund and the only listed company dedicated to investing in real estate in Macau, the world's largest gaming market and the only city in China in which gaming is permitted.

As a member of the Equity Shares in Commercial Companies (ESCC) segment of the London Stock Exchange, the Company has historically held multi-segment property assets in Macau and Zhuhai, China. Its current portfolio comprises prime residential assets fair valued at US$200.5 million, which are being progressively divested with the objective of distributing the remaining liquidity to shareholders.

MPO is managed by Sniper Capital Limited, an Asia-based property investment manager.

Stock Code

London Stock Exchange: MPO

LEI

213800NOAO11OWIMLR72

For further information, please contact:

Manager

Sniper Capital Limited

Group Communications

Tel: +853 2870 5151

Email: [email protected]

Corporate Broker

Panmure Liberum Limited

Darren Vickers / Owen Matthews

Tel: +44 20 3100 2000

Company Secretary & Administrator

Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited

Kevin Smith

Tel: +44 14 8174 2742

MACAU PROPERTY OPPORTUNITIES FUND LIMITED

ANNUAL RESULTS & ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2024

Corporate Introduction

Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited, a closed-end investment company, was incorporated and registered in Guernsey under the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended) on 18 May 2006, under registration number 44813. The Company is an authorised entity under the Authorised Closed-Ended Investment Schemes Rules 2008. The Company is a member of the Equity Shares in Commercial Companies ("ESCC") segment of the London Stock Exchange which replaced the previous premium and standard segments on 29 July 2024.

Sniper Capital Limited, the Manager for MPO, is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Company's property portfolio and the identification and execution of divestment opportunities.

The Company's entire remaining investment portfolio is allocated to residential property investments in Macau. The Company is managed with the objective of realising the value of all remaining assets in its portfolio, individually, in aggregate or in any other combination of disposals or transaction structures, in a prudent manner, consistent with the principles of good investment management with a view to making an orderly return of capital to shareholders. Its overriding aim is to deliver cost-effective and timely divestments of the three remaining properties, to enable further returns of capital to the shareholders. The Company has ceased to make any new investments and will not undertake additional borrowings other than to refinance existing loans or for short-term working capital purposes.

The Board reflects a diversity of ethnicity, gender and relevant experience from a corporate, sectoral and geographical perspective, coupled with a deep understanding of the unique features of Macau, its property market and the Company's portfolio. The Board has assessed that it has the capacity to fulfil its obligations in the context of the latest corporate governance guidelines, taking full account of the Company's late-stage divestment and its clearly defined business objectives.

Pursuant to its Articles of Incorporation, MPO is subject to annual continuation votes. At the annual general meeting (AGM) held on 21 December 2023, Shareholders voted in favour of a Continuation Resolution to extend the life of the Company for a further year until the next continuation vote on or before 31 December 2024. The Board will be recommending the continuation of the Company at the AGM, which is expected to be held in December.

Key Facts

Exchange

London Stock Exchange

Main Market

Symbol

MPO

Lookup

Reuters - MPO.L

Bloomberg - MPO:LN

Domicile

Guernsey

Shares in Issue

61,835,733

Shares Held in Treasury

Nil

Share Denomination

Pounds sterling; Reporting currency: US Dollars

Fee Structure

Realisation-focused fee structure that incentivises the Manager to divest assets at realistic prices

Inception Date

5 June 2006

Amount Returned to Shareholders Since Inception

US$173 million (distribution US$97.4 million;

share buyback US$75.3 million)

Net IPO Proceeds

GBP101 million (US$189 million)

ADVISERS & SERVICE PROVIDERS

Company Secretary and Administrator

Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited

Corporate Broker

Liberum Capital Limited

External Auditor

Deloitte LLP

Chairman's Message

Our overriding priority remains optimising ways

to deliver a return of capital.

I present my Chairman's Statement for the financial year ended 30 June 2024, and also outline my views on the way forward for the Company.

The current financial year has seen the Company make further progress in delivering our divestment programme through successful sales of 13 units at The Waterside, with three additional units sold following year-end. Sales have been delivered against the backdrop of ongoing market challenges, very thin demand for luxury property - the market segment to which we are exposed - and, more recently, from heavily discounted sales by developers under pressure to meet bank loan repayments. These conditions have hurt our returns and impacted our year-end property valuations.

The sales achieved during the year enabled the Company's gross borrowings with banks to be reduced from US$105.6 million to US$82.8 million. With further sales completed after year-end, the Company's borrowings have fallen to US$68.9 million. The repayment of loans and the reduction of associated debt service levels has been a key objective during the year. We have been consistent in our targeted approach, and have remained pragmatic in our pricing to deliver divestments in a very tight market. We are mindful that sales velocity has been slower than we anticipated, but would stress that working within, rather than against, the market is the only means by which we can maximise returns in this environment.

Market sentiment remains cautious with buyers generally being opportunistic in nature with demand coming principally from local Macau residents and Macau resident card holders. The economic difficulties faced by China - especially in relation to the real estate sector - together with a mixed economic recovery in Macau, have further weighed on sentiment and impacted banks' risk appetite for property lending. This has affected both existing property-related debt and also borrowing by prospective property purchasers. The Manager has continued to work closely with the Company's lenders, who remain supportive of our investment strategy and understand our considered approach in the current market circumstances.

As previously announced, during the final quarter of our financial year, we saw a significant step by Macau's government in relaxing or removing many property ownership restrictions and property-related taxes. These measures were long overdue, and very welcome. These policy changes reflect the lacklustre condition of the property market, especially amid the post-COVID recovery. Paradoxically, in the near term, these changes have distorted the market, as primary property developers with significant inventories have come under selling pressure due to their debt levels. This has seen a significant increase in post-announcement sales volumes compared with very low numbers earlier, but at enforced lower prices, which has fed into near-term valuations. It also had a short-term impact on our loan-to-value ratio, which we expect to improve following year-end, when further property sales complete.

The Manager's advice to the Board is that, in contrast to Hong Kong, where a similar relaxation of property market measures took place, the supply pipeline of high-end property in Macau is extremely limited. Moreover, there have been significantly fewer new developments in recent years, which has had the effect of reducing the overall inventory of available property when compared to Hong Kong. This can be seen reflected in transaction volumes, with secondary property transactions in the luxury sector numbering below 20 units in Q4 2023.

Fundamentally, therefore, we see greater scope for improvement in property values and higher numbers of transactions in Macau, and hence there is reason to sense some optimism. Any further measures to support or stimulate the market would be welcome. Throughout the past financial year, debt service has been a high cost that the Board is determined to reduce, aided by the welcome easing of interest rates by the United States that is feeding through into rates in Macau.

Navigating external factors and the changing market dynamics in Macau has required flexibility and agility. The Manager has achieved sales against a challenging backdrop and continues to keep the Board fully informed on a regular basis so that sensible, pragmatic, timely decisions can be made on pricing and sales. This is important when seen in the context of wholesale disposals that some primary developers have been forced to make. Hong Kong's experience suggests that a return to more normal sales volumes will materialise over time. Clearly, any measures aimed at steadying and stabilising Macau's property market would be welcome, and would help to build confidence, which is the key to moving forward with an increased pace of sales.

A key assessment for the Board in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts has been to carefully consider our Going Concern Statement, which is set out in detail on in the Directors' Report. The methodology adopted is similar to that of previous years but takes account of the reduced levels of debt and the ongoing sales that have been achieved including post year-end  sales. We recognise market difficulties but, in our judgement, the record of our Manager in delivering sales amid challenging circumstances is an important consideration. We have also identified market risks and have factored these into our medium-term tactics for delivering our debt reduction and divestment programme.

We have additionally considered the effect of market dynamics, which lead us to believe that we are unlikely to achieve a full disposal of the entire portfolio in 2024. It remains our view that the interests of the Company are best served by continuing our carefully managed  divestment programme through a further one-year extension of the life of the Company. The dramatic effect of bank-enforced sales by developers and the associated near-term erosion of valuations reinforces our view that triggering a wholesale disposal of our remaining portfolio would have a detrimental effect on shareholder value. Quite simply, the market does not have the capacity to absorb a higher volume of transactions at anything like the price levels that we would need to apply, and it is not clear whether such a sudden disposal would deliver a return of capital to shareholders. Accordingly, at our Annual General Meeting in December 2024, the Board will be seeking approval to extend the Company's life for a further year.

As prefaced in our Interim Report and separately announced on 26 June 2024 the Board and the Manager have agreed a revised fee basis for the Manager's compensation. This agreement now runs for the remaining life of the Company and continues the flat fee of US$100,000 per month. It allows for a reduction in the base fees payable from calendar year 2025 onwards, based on performance, a revised basis for any incentive fees, and is capped in any event at 5% of market capitalisation. Full details are set out in the Directors' Report. We believe that providing certainty and suitable incentives is key to managing our remaining assets and debt to return the maximum amount of capital to shareholders.

Detailed updates on our portfolio are contained in the Manager's Report. However, in summary form, the following should be noted:

The Waterside

The Waterside retains a distinctive position within the high-end residential market segment, as demonstrated by the sales and prices that have been achieved compared with rival developments. 29 units remain available for sale, including many on higher floors that have greater intrinsic valuations.

We have agreed that the Manager should terminate the active leasing of units as we prepare the remaining properties for sale. However, a number of attractive leasing opportunities continue to present themselves with terms that are carefully managed. The level of leasing is marginally higher - just above 70% occupancy and it remains an important contribution to debt servicing.

The Fountainside

Negotiations continue on potential sales of Fountainside units, although transactions have yet to be achieved. The four available villas are large in the context of the market and are challenged by the current environment, particularly in respect of mortgages for prospective purchasers.

The smaller remaining units have been prepared for sale. A series of frustrating procedural obstacles and steps have been imposed by government departments, delaying the release of the units onto the market. We remain of the view that once the required approvals have been achieved, sales will follow quickly, because there is clear and evident demand for units of their size and in their location.

Penha Heights

Challenges associated with selling this very special property remain. We believe the market will need to see a further recovery and increased confidence, even though the Manager has been engaged in innovative marketing of the property. It is to be hoped that its higher profile among a wider market of ultra-high net worth individuals will support the enhanced marketing that is to follow.

Macau and China

Macau's economy has continued to recover, with double-digit growth. A return to its pre-COVID size is forecast for 2025, and although this is encouraging, it is later than previous economic forecasts. However, it may represent a more realistic and sustainable level of growth.

Confidence is the key component, from our perspective, and in this context, improving gaming and visitor numbers are important. Nevertheless, an evident slowdown in the non-gaming sector, which we have noted in earlier reports, remains a concern. It is a matter that requires government attention, notwithstanding that unemployment has been significantly reduced in the past year and further stimulus measures are being seen.

China's economic data has remained poor and significant stimulus measures have recently been announced, although it is too soon to fully understand the effects; however, we note that equity markets have reacted positively. External confidence in China is now lower than during the immediate post-COVID era. The sector most relevant to our Company is, of course, real estate, and measures to stimulate the Chinese market have had only a limited effect. There has been a knock-on impact on lending institutions - especially amid continued signs of stress at some of the bigger property developers - that has played a part in the way banks have handled their loan portfolios, including in Macau.

Debt Management

Interest rates remained unhelpfully high throughout the reporting period. Debt service remains our highest cost, and a reduction of debt levels through sales remains a key near-term focus.

Banks have remained cautious and generally risk-averse as economic conditions and the real estate sector have worsened in China. We have benefited from open, constructive engagement between our lenders and the Manager, in which support for our considered, market-sensitive approach - including phased debt repayments to coincide with sales - has been helpful. This stands in marked contrast to the sell-off dynamic affecting primary developers in Macau.

There are signs that interest rates are finally easing, having potentially peaked amid developments in the United States. This will not only provide welcome relief to the Company, but it may also further improve market confidence, which will aid our divestment programme.

Financial Performance

Amid a credit squeeze in the property lending market that has dampened investment sentiment and transaction volume, our portfolio's valuation declined 8% from 30 June 2023. The Company's adjusted net asset value (NAV) was US$66.1 million as of 30 June 2024. This is equivalent to US$1.07 (85 pence) per share and represents a decline of 26.9% (27.1% in sterling terms) compared to the previous year. NAV, which records inventory at cost rather than market value, was US$0.75 per share (59 pence), down 29.4% from the previous year.

The Company has remained in compliance with its debt covenants. Its shares closed at 35.6 pence at the end of the reporting period, a decrease of 39.1% over the year. The share price discount to adjusted NAV increased to 58% as of 30 June 2024, up from 50% the previous year, detailed information about adjusted NAV is shown in Note 18. The recent weakness in the share price, which may be driven partly by broader market sentiment, has been noted, together with trading volumes, which remain very low.

Environmental Social and Governance

Our approach to the very limited but necessary maintenance and minor works across the property portfolio has focused mainly on end-of-lease remediation at The Waterside and continues to comply with our detailed ESG policy.

Governance remains at the core of how we approach our responsibilities, and our three-person Board has the necessary mix of diverse skillsets, gender and ethnicity. We continue to hold the view that in this very late stage of the Company's life, changes to the Board would be counterproductive.

Non-executive Director Alan Clifton has exceeded the normal tenure guidance set out in external corporate governance codes. He continues to demonstrate independence through action, and his experience is important in the context of our broad functions. This, coupled with the challenges of finding a suitable director for what will be a comparatively short tenure amid such challenging market circumstances, is why we are proposing that Mr Clifton continues to serve as a director.

Our strategy is clearly defined: our objectives are to deliver a reduction and then elimination of debt followed by a return of capital at the earliest practicable opportunity, a strategy that will be delivered in the context of prevailing market dynamics.

Outlook

Looking beyond the near term factors that have affected the property market in Macau, the impact of easing restrictions and reduced property taxes, lower interest rates and signs of further economic stimulus measures provide a more encouraging medium term outlook and a basis for market confidence and sentiment to improve.

We will navigate through the near-term market challenges and continue looking for every opportunity to achieve our divestment objectives to repay debt and distribute capital back to our shareholders. This will continue to require a tactical approach to the market and to the sale of what remain high quality assets. This is especially the case for The Waterside where the reducing number of units available makes for a scarcity which we will look to exploit.

We believe that Macau will continue its post COVID recovery and see further economic growth with a return to historic levels of prosperity which will, in turn, support our strategy.

MARK HUNTLEY

CHAIRMAN

MACAU PROPERTY OPPORTUNITIES FUND LIMITED

27 September 2024

Board of Directors

MARK HUNTLEY

Chairman

Mark Huntley has more than 40 years of experience of fund management, administration and fiduciary operations. His involvement in funds and private assets has spanned real estate, private equity and emerging market investment. He has served on the boards of listed and private investment funds and of management/general partner entities. Mr Huntley is a resident of Guernsey.

ALAN CLIFTON

Non-executive Director

Chairman of Audit and Risk Committee

Alan Clifton began his career at stockbroker Kitcat & Aitken, first as an analyst, thereafter becoming a Partner and then a Managing Partner, prior to the firm's acquisition by the Royal Bank of Canada. He was subsequently invited to take up the role of Managing Director of the asset management arm of Aviva, the UK's largest insurance group. He has had a long non-executive career as an Independent Director of numerous investment and finance sector companies. Mr Clifton is a UK resident.

CARMEN LING

Non-executive Director

Carmen Ling has more than 25 years of banking experience. She has served as a Managing Director at Citigroup and Standard Chartered Bank, and she has extensive experience of client coverage, real estate, transaction banking and network strategies. Her role as global head of RMB Internationalisation/Belt & Road at Standard Chartered Bank added to her unique knowledge and experience as an international banker. Before beginning her banking career, Ms Ling worked in the hospitality industry for hotel project developments in North Asia, including China and Japan. She is a resident of Hong Kong.

Manager's Report

Introduction

The financial year under review was characterised by countervailing forces in Macau's economy: a robust post-pandemic recovery on the one hand, and the property market's most difficult year in four decades on the other.

This led to successful lobbying by industry players that saw Macau's government dismantle its decade-old policies aimed at curbing property speculation in April. Although the move was relatively recent and likely has yet to feed through into the market, there have been some early signs of renewed interest in property investments in the territory, albeit primarily in the lower, "affordable" end of the property market.

There has been a slight increase in confidence as a result of the recent interest rate cut by the United States Federal Reserve, and Macau's reduction of its base rate in response. This will be a key influence on the luxury end of the property market, in which investors are more focused on investment returns.

Despite these challenges, the Manager continued to expand its strata sales programme at The Waterside, with the divestment of 13 units during the financial year, bringing total divestments at the property to 27 units for a combined US$77.7 million. During the financial year, 11 units were completed with net proceeds of US$28.5 million received, including one prior financial year divestment completed in this financial year.  The remaining 3 units sold during the financial year completed the sales process post year-end.

Financial Review

¹  Based on the following US dollar/sterling exchange rates on 30 June: 2019: 1.270; 2020: 1.231; 2021: 1.386; 2022: 1.212; 2023: 1.261; 2024: 1.265

^a  Refer to Note 18 for calculation of Adjusted NAV and Adjusted NAV per share

^b  Refer to Notes 6 & 7 for independent valuations of the Group's portfolio including investment property and inventories

^c  MPO returned US$50.5 million (50p per share) to shareholders in 2018

Financial Results

Valuation

Against the backdrop of the economic difficulties brought on by Macau's strict zero-COVID policies in H2 2022, coupled with higher interest rates, the Company's portfolio, comprising three main assets, was fair valued by its valuers, Savills (Macau) Limited at US$152.7 million as at 30 June 2024. On a like-for-like comparison, excluding units at The Waterside that had been sold, the portfolio depreciated by 8% from the previous year, continuing the decline that set in during the height of the pandemic.

Savills attributed the decline to poor market sentiment, for which there are several reasons.

First, the establishment of Macau's Credit Data Platform at the beginning of 2023 has enabled banks and other credit providers in the territory to share customers' personal credit information, which has resulted in individual mortgage loan applications undergoing more rigorous assessment.

Secondly, a credit squeeze in the property loan market has prompted some borrowers to execute quick sales at below-market prices to repay or reduce their outstanding loans.

Thirdly, banks' appetite for financing new property loans has diminished, putting pressure on both property buyers and sellers. As a result, market sentiment has taken a hit, dragging down the number of property transactions and prices, particularly affecting the luxury real estate market, in which valuations are highly sensitive to investor sentiment.

As a consequence of the decline in the value of the portfolio and the high interest rate environment, MPO's adjusted net asset value (NAV) was US$66.1 million, which translates to US$1.07 (85 pence) per share, a 26.9% decrease year on year (YoY). The Company's IFRS NAV, which records inventory at cost rather than market value (and which includes two of the Company's main property assets), was US$46.4 million, or US$0.75 (59 pence) per share, a 29.4% drop over the one-year period.

Capital Management

Capital management continues to be a key priority for the Company. As at 30 June 2024, total assets on the Company's balance sheet, two of which were carried at cost, were valued at US$137.9 million, while aggregate liabilities were US$91.5 million.

Nevertheless, with new sales achieved during the financial year, the Company's debt position has continued to improve. As at 30 June 2024, its gross borrowings had dropped to US$82.8 million from US$105.6 million at the end of the previous financial year. Yet despite the reduction in gross borrowings, its loan-to-value ratio stood at 52.5%, a slight increase from 50.9% at the end of the previous financial year due to the overall decline in its portfolio valuation.

Following the year end, the Company's debt position has improved further as three transactions at The Waterside have been completed over the course of September. A substantial portion of the sales proceeds have been applied to further pay down the Company's debt. As a result, the Company's gross borrowings fell to US$68.9 million, resulting in a loan-to-value ratio of 49.6%.

Cash Management

The Company ended the financial year with a consolidated cash balance (including deposits with lenders) of US$4.8 million, of which US$0.2 million free cash and US$4.6 million remains pledged with lenders. This sum comprises largely the sales proceeds from the disposal of The Waterside units and the interest reserve during the financial year. As of 27 September 2024, the Company's free cash balance increased from US$0.2 million to US$1.3 million following completions of sales occurring post year end and September 2024 loan repayments.

The Monetary Authority of Macao's last interest rate increase in July 2023, its 11th since July 2022, pushed the base rate up to 5.75%, a 15-year high for the territory. This further increased the Company's financing costs. As a result, the Company has continued to implement several debt management measures. As a prudential measure, interest reserves have been carefully monitored through cost control and cash management processes. 75% of the sales proceeds from The Waterside has also been earmarked for repayment of the principal sums of outstanding credit facility and the remainder 25% for operating capital. Finally, the Company continues to explore refinancing options with other lenders to reduce its financing costs. Although Macau and Hong Kong have followed the recent United States Federal Reserve's rate cut and Macau banks has reduced its prime rate by 25 basis points, the impact on the property market has not yet been seen.

Portfolio Overview

As of 30 Jun 2024

*   One Central is a trademark registered in Macau SAR under the name of Basecity Investments Limited. Sniper Capital Limited, Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited, MPOF Macau (Site 5) Limited, Bela Vista Property Services Limited and The Waterside are not associated with Basecity Investments Limited, Shun Tak Holdings Limited or Hongkong Land Holdings Limited.

**  3 Waterside units have been divested with completion occurred after year end, bringing the number of units available for sale to 32.

*** Information listed refers to the remaining units and parking spaces available for sale.

Portfolio Updates

Divestment Performance

Undeterred by the impact of the pandemic on economic activity, and attracted by the current pricing levels, a number of investors and owner/occupiers in Macau are still seeking to upgrade their residences. The Manager's marketing strategy has been to seek out cash-rich buyers who intend to retain apartments for their own long-term use, typically as primary residences either for themselves or their adult children or as holiday homes. Most purchasers intend to "buy and hold" and fall within the working adult demographic, aged 20-60 years.

Among the reasons they cite for selecting The Waterside are its attractive, central location on the Macau Peninsula, its premium design, which offers the exclusivity of a maximum of two units on each floor, and the availability of spacious, three-bedroom layouts of more than 2,200 square feet. In addition, the apartments may be sold on a fully furnished basis, complete with new electrical appliances, offering purchasers the convenience of moving in immediately upon completion with only their suitcases. Thanks to its unique characteristics, The Waterside stood out as one of the few luxury residential buildings with spacious, three-bedroom units in Macau that saw multiple sales over the financial year.

In the face of competitive offerings of first-hand properties by other developers, the Manager utilised a flexible sales approach that enabled investors to purchase apartments with or without an existing lease. Transacted prices also reflect a discretionary discount within a competitive range.

The Waterside

The Waterside is the Company's flagship asset, a 59-unit luxury apartment block in the prime Macau Peninsula area. The strata sales programme at the property commenced in H1 2022 to H2 2024 resulted in the sale of 27 units with a combined value of HK$607 million (approximately US$77.7 million). 32 units remained at the period end. Subsequently a further three units have been sold, leaving 29 units available for sale as at end of September.

13 units were sold during the financial year comprised 11 standard units, one simplex unit and one duplex unit. The average price of the units transacted was HK$8,493 per square foot, which translates to a 13% discount to the valuation closest to their transaction dates. In the course of the financial year, 10 of the 13 unit sold at The Waterside have completed the full sales process, with the remaining units completed post year-end.

The Company is winding down the leasing programme at The Waterside to enable it to focus firmly on divestment. Among the remaining 32 units at The Waterside at end-June 2024, 22 units were leased out, with 9 new leases signed and 13 leases renewed during the financial year. This has resulted in an occupancy rate of 71% of the remaining units available for sale by gross floor area. Rents at The Waterside have increased by 13%, at an average monthly rate of HK$19.25 per square foot.

The Fountainside

The Fountainside is a low-density, 42-unit freehold residential development in Macau's Penha Hill district. All 36 standard units from its original configuration have been sold, leaving four villas, three reconfigured apartments and two car-parking spaces available for sale.

The three apartments were reconfigured from the development's original two duplexes to meet market demand for more affordable units among small families and young individuals. Although the reconfiguration was completed in Q3 2022, there have been protracted delays in the issuance of occupancy permits by the Land and Urban Construction Bureau due to administrative backlogs and late requests for alterations by the authorities. This has in turn delayed the commencement of the sales and marketing campaign. We now expect the occupancy permits to be issued in late Q4 2024 to early Q1 2025.

The Manager launched open-house events for the villas, to target existing residents in the neighbourhood who are looking to relocate to a newer development. There have been viewings by potential buyers, whose interest has mainly involved individual villas rather than an en-bloc transaction.

Penha Heights

Penha Heights is a prestigious, five-storey, colonial-style villa covering more than 12,000 square feet. Nestled amid lush greenery atop Penha Hill, an exclusive and highly desirable residential enclave, the trophy home offers sweeping bay views. The Company has immaculately maintained and enhanced the property, preserving its exceptional charm and appeal.

In addition to existing marketing channels, the Company also enabled high-net worth individuals to experience the villa first hand by partnering with an international luxury brand to host an event on the premises in May. The high-end luxury gourmet event consisted of two dinners and one lunch over the course of two days, with high-net worth individuals from around Asia in attendance. The event showcased the villa's potential as an elegant residence both for living and entertaining.

Macroeconomic Update

Economic indicators suggest a sustained recovery

During both H2 2023 and H1 2024, Macau enjoyed a robust economic recovery as its twin economic engines - tourism and gaming - powered ahead to make up for ground lost during the pandemic. In 2023, the territory recorded gross domestic product growth of 81% YoY as the economy reached approximately 80% of its 2019 pre-pandemic size. First-quarter 2024 GDP growth was approximately 26% YoY, while GDP for H1 2024 is expected to reach 18% YoY as the economy grows to around 88% of its pre-COVID size.

Tourism and gaming continue to lead the economic recovery

Macau's visitor arrivals hit 28 million in 2023, approximately 72% of 2019's pre-pandemic number. The vast majority of visitors - some 94% - came from mainland China and Hong Kong, accounting for 68% and 26% of all visitors, respectively, while international visitors comprised 5% of the total. Comparing 2023's numbers with 2019's, visitor arrivals from Hong Kong recovered to 98% of pre-pandemic levels, but mainland Chinese visitor arrivals were around 68% of 2019's level and international visitor arrivals were roughly 48%.

The territory's government has targeted 33 million visitors for 2024, approximately 84% of 2019's number. This includes a target of 2 million overseas visitors. H1 2024 visitor numbers indicate that the territory is on course to reach these targets. Visitor arrivals for the period were close to 17 million, representing an increase of 44% YoY, or around 83% of 2019's level, while overseas visitors accounted for just over 1 million of the total.

Macau's hotel occupancy rate in H1 2024 was 84%, an improvement of 6.1 percentage points YoY, while average room rates surged 11% to MPO1,403 (US$175) per night, indicating stronger demand.

Macau regained the top spot among global gaming hubs

Last year appeared to herald a new dawn for Macau's gaming operators, with the current gaming framework coming into effect at the beginning of 2023. As Macau's zero-COVID policies ended abruptly in January that year, gaming operators moved rapidly to recover ground lost during the pandemic. By the end of 2023, the sector had turned the corner, with Macau regaining its status from Las Vegas as the world's top gaming hub.

The territory's gross gaming revenue (GGR) grew 334% YoY during full-year 2023, reaching 62% of 2019's pre-pandemic level. As full-year GGR exceeded MOP180 billion (US$22.4 billion), the six gaming operators in the territory were obligated to increase their non-gaming spending by 20%, in line with the provisions of the new gaming framework. Examples of non-gaming spending include investments to promote the conventions and exhibitions business, entertainment and performances, sports events, culture, art, healthcare and theme parks.

In the post-pandemic "new normal", with the demise of the junket business, the premium mass-market and mass-market segments dominated Macau's gaming business. As these segments were more profitable, gaming operators also saw their EBITDA margins expand to 29% in 2023, up from the industry's previous peak of 24%.

In H1 2024, GGR grew 42% YoY to around 76% of 2019's level. It is expected to expand by some 14% YoY in the second half of 2024 to reach 82% of 2019's level.

Government policies to boost struggling property sector

Despite Macau's robust post-pandemic economic recovery, the real estate market continued to be subdued, resulting in 2023 being touted by industry players as "the lowest point and the most difficult year for the development of the real estate market in 40 years". The real estate sector had faced several challenges - the unfolding real estate crisis in China and resulting economic slowdown, a 15-year high in interest rates and the dampening impact of decade-long measures to curb property speculation. The cumulative effect of these pain points was especially evident in the luxury real estate sector where the Company operates, leading to decreased transaction volume and lower valuations.

At the urging of industry players, Macau's government made a series of unprecedented policy moves in April that effectively removed all anti-speculation measures relating to the property sector. These measures mirrored a similar move by the Hong Kong government two months earlier. In particular, the following matters were addressed:

•   Removal of special stamp duties, namely:

o   Stamp duty levied on properties resold within 24 months after being purchased

o   An extra 10% duty imposed on foreign buyers

o   A 5% extra duty on additional ownership

•   An increase in the maximum mortgage loan-to-value ratio ceiling for foreign buyers to 70% from around 40% previously

The removal of these constraints is positive for investor interest in residential properties. The market is behaving generally in the same manner as the market in Hong Kong, which introduced similar measures ahead of Macau, and where the immediate reaction was for developers to offload first-hand properties at steep discounts to repay debt, while buyers took advantage of the opportunity to transact at attractive prices of up to 25% below their peak. Transactions are therefore largely concentrated on first-hand properties and smaller units with lower prices. The secondary market, which is where our portfolio sits, will benefit in the medium term once the initial sell-down is over.

The Macau General Association of Real Estate has lobbied the government to provide an additional boost to home purchases by increasing the maximum loan-to-value ratio for local homebuyers to 85% from the current 70%, which would effectively halve the size of downpayments required from mortgage applicants. The association's call came after the property market showed only modest signs of recovery following the lifting of the anti-speculation measures.

Residential property recovering from 40-year low point

Following the introduction of the above policy measures, Macau's residential real estate sector saw a 19% increase in sales volume, driven mainly by a surge in transactions in Taipa, where developer inventory was located and where residential sales soared 196% between May and June. However, the Macau Peninsula saw a drop in sales of 48% and sales in Coloane slumped 57%.

Although average property prices increased by 8% during the same period, prices in the Macau Peninsula and Coloane saw upticks, while conversely, prices in Taipa declined slightly.

Market reports indicate that the increase in transaction volume is due to developers offloading properties at the affordable end of the primary market, taking advantage of the willingness of buyers to transact in favourable market conditions. Even though industry players have been upbeat about the lifting of the anti-speculation measures ushering in a turnaround in Macau's residential property market, there has been some caution over whether the market's upward trajectory can be sustained over the longer term. This is due to continued weakness in the mainland China market as well as parallels drawn from Hong Kong's property market, which has remained quiet after the territory's government lifted similar curbs in February.

Luxury residential segment still faces uphill battle

In the luxury residential segment, 106 sales of units above 150 square metres were recorded in H1 2024, an increase of 25% YoY, primarily attributed to a surge in transactions during Q2 2024 following the policy change. In Q2 2024, prices for units above 150 square metres increased 2% YoY. Although there are early signs of a recovery of transaction volumes and prices in the luxury market due to the lifting of the anti-speculation policies, the Manager remains cautious about the sustainability of the uptrend. In Hong Kong, where similar measures were introduced, the market has shown signs of weakness after an initial boost.

Among the chief constraints is the prevailing high interest rate environment, which has deterred real estate investors. In July 2023, the Monetary Authority of Macao announced its 11th increase in the prime lending rate since 2022, pushing the base rate up to 5.75%. Its decision was made to keep in lockstep with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the United States Federal Reserve, despite relatively low inflation in Macau.

Interest rates have remained stable throughout the financial year, with Macau's base rate reaching a 15-year high. However, recent policy statements from the Federal Reserve indicate that inflation in the United States has improved significantly, creating a favourable environment for a shift towards easing monetary policy in the latter half of 2024. On September 19, the Federal Reserve implemented a half-point rate cut, signalling the beginning of a new era of monetary easing.

We expect these interest rate cuts to be welcomed by the property sector as a whole, and in particular, the luxury residential segment, in which potential investors place greater importance on expected yields when considering and comparing investment opportunities or seek price reductions to compensate for lower expected returns.

China's economic challenges weigh on investor sentiment

Mainland China's slowing economic growth and its continued property downturn have had a spillover effect on Macau. In December 2023, Moody's downgraded its outlook for Chinese sovereign bonds to negative, pointing to risks arising from the country's slowing economy and property crisis. The downgrade, mainland China's first since 2017, also reflected concerns over local and municipal government debt levels and the indebtedness of state-owned enterprises. Despite Macau's robust economic recovery, Moody's also cut the territory's credit outlook from "stable" to "negative", based on the tight institutional, economic and financial linkages between the SAR and mainland China.

In addition, although mainland China's GDP grew 5.2% in 2023 and 5.3% in Q1 2024, it expanded at a lower rate of 4.7% in Q2 2024, the slowest pace since the first quarter of 2023 and missing analysts' expectations of around 5%. The country's consumer sector saw retail sales slow to an 18-month low, with a resulting fall in retail prices across the board. Analysts see this as the cumulative impact of falling property and stock prices, coupled with low wage growth, which has eroded consumer confidence and reined in spending as people reduce consumption and focus on basic "eat, drink and play" expenditure while postponing big-ticket purchases.

To address the problems in the property market, the mainland Chinese government in May 2024 announced its most significant policy measures to date to boost the ailing sector and deal with an estimated US$3.9 trillion worth of unsold properties. The measures include a 300 billion yuan facility made available by the central bank for relending for affordable housing, an easing of mortgage rules, and moves to encourage local governments and state-owned enterprises to buy up unsold units.

Recently, on September 24, 2024, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) unveiled an extensive stimulus package to further support the economy. Key components of this package include a reduction in the reserve requirement ratio by 50 basis points, which is expected to inject approximately 1 trillion yuan (US$142 billion) into the financial market. Additionally, the PBOC lowered the seven-day repo rate from 1.7% to 1.5%,signalling a potential cut in the loan prime rate (LPR) that affects both corporate and household loans, including mortgages. Moreover, the minimum down payment for mortgages will be unified, reducing the down payment for second homes from 25% to 15%.

It is believed that China's stimulus package can boost Macau's gaming revenues and bring in more tourists through increased household disposable income, and provide drivers to bolster the Macau economy.

Extension of Company Life and Fee Revision

Although Macau's economy has continued its growth momentum after the government's lifting of strict COVID-19 restrictions in January 2023, there has been no immediate spillover effect on the property market, especially the higher-end luxury segment. Therefore, in 2023, while the Company's divestment programme made progress, it was clear that there was no quick fix, and the Company's shareholders approved a resolution to extend its life to 31 December 2024.

We thank our shareholders for supporting the continuation vote at the Company's Annual General Meeting in December 2023 and approving the resolution to extend its life until 31 December 2024. This has given the Company further opportunities to advance its divestment programme, in line with increased interest in Macau properties, and potentially capitalise on measures introduced by Macau's government to boost the property sector.

A new Management Agreement has been negotiated between the Board and the Manager which includes a fee structure designed to continue to incentivise the Manager to achieve substantial sales. Among the main points in the new arrangements is the option for the Board to reduce management fees, recalculate realisation fees, and reduce the notice period for the termination of the management agreement. A full description of the variation of the investment management fee arrangements can be found in the Director's Report.

In addition, as the changes to the fee arrangements constituted a related-party transaction under the London Stock Exchange's UK Listing Rules, the Company obtained written confirmation from its Sponsor that the terms are fair and reasonable insofar as the Company's shareholders are concerned.

In view of the current market conditions as outlined in this report, the timely completion of the Company's divestment programme is likely to require additional time in order to maximise valuations in sales transactions. Therefore, even though the Manager will deploy all possible strategies to secure further sales, it is likely that another proposal for an extension of the Company's life, to the end of 2025, will be necessary to enable the divestment programme to progress in an orderly manner and maximise value for shareholders.

With the uplift of Government restrictions, improvement in Macau's economy driven by increased tourist inflows and gaming revenues, and the recent interest rate cut, there is optimism that the property market may see further improvement. Against this backdrop we have confidence that, in due course, the orderly disposal of the Fund's assets can be achieved and deliver the best outcome for our shareholders.

Outlook

Macau's economic recovery is on track for 14-17% growth in 2024, reaching approximately 95% of its pre-pandemic size. Visitor arrivals are projected to reach 84% of pre-pandemic levels, while GGR is expected to grow to 82%, signalling significant progress toward full economic recovery.

However, this growth remains concentrated in the tourism and gaming sectors. The property market, in contrast, faces distinct challenges, including high interest rates and economic slowdown in mainland China. While the recent rate cut and the Chinese stimulus package have generated a sense of optimism, it is still too early to assess their full impact. The decade-long policies curbing property speculation, only lifted in April, previously dampened investor interest, especially in luxury real estate. As a result, the luxury residential segment, in which the Company operates, remains a tough sell to investors.

We will continue to manage the portfolio divestment programme to achieve timely sales and reduce debt levels. The Manager will actively seek investor interest spurred by recent policy changes and potential opportunities arising from recent interest rate cuts. While sustained improvement in investor sentiment is crucial to fully realizing the portfolio's value, we will pursue all available sales opportunities.

Environmental, Social and Governance Report

1   About this report

This ESG report has been prepared with reference to the Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). The report elaborates the environmental and social responsibility measures and the related performance of Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited.

1.1 Company core business

The Company is in the process of an orderly and managed divestment of its three remaining portfolio properties. No new construction or development activities will be undertaken aside from a limited reconfiguration at The Fountainside.

The Company is focused on and exposed solely to the high-end residential property market in Macau. It has never had any exposure to any property or other investments in the gaming or associated hospitality sectors, and each investment is in full compliance with the parameters set out in the Company's prospectus.

1.2 Report boundary

The ESG report focuses on the environmental and social responsibility performance of the Company's core business of investment in properties in Macau, as listed below:

•   The Waterside

•   The Fountainside

•   Penha Heights

1.3 Overall ESG approach

The Board understands the significance of ESG and has incorporated ESG-related risks into the Company's risk management processes. The Company's overall ESG approach is aimed at generating returns for shareholders in a responsible manner while taking into consideration environmental and social responsibility and supply chain management.

The Company's ESG approach has been developed based on the Ten Principles of UNGC. The UNGC is a voluntary, multi-stakeholder platform that convenes multinational companies to align with The Ten Principles relating to human rights, labour, the environment and anti-corruption standards. The Board is committed to the basic concepts of fairness, honesty and respect for people and the environment in its business activities.

2   Environment

2.1 Commitment principle

The Company aims at all times to adopt environment-friendly practices in its business operations to minimise any potential negative impacts on the environment and natural resources. It complies strictly with all applicable environmental laws and regulations in Macau. Different environmental protection measures have been implemented at key stages of property development, alongside the incorporation of green building designs and the implementation of responsible construction practices at work sites. The Company also upholds the principles of recycling and reuse at its properties.

2.2 Initiatives and performance

Property design

The Company follows local green building requirements that take into consideration green design principles relating to project elements such as building materials, indoor air quality, site selection and energy use. Examples of green building designs and features are as follows:

-   preservation and retention of cultural heritage such as façades of historic buildings;

-   incorporation of passive building designs to improve ventilation and optimise natural light;

-   use of water-efficient fixtures; and

-   greening of rooftops.

Indoor air quality is improved through the introduction of air purifying equipment. Measures for monitoring temperature and humidity in residential units and thus enhancing living conditions for residents have been implemented at One Central and The Fountainside.

Property management

Various green measures have been adopted at our properties to improve overall environmental performance, for example:

-   Energy efficiency: Energy consumption has been reduced by (i) replacing incandescent, halogen and fluorescent lighting with LED lighting, (ii) reducing the amount of lighting used in common areas, and (iii) installing air-conditioning systems with energy-efficiency labelling, in accordance with local requirements.

-   Resident engagement: Residents are encouraged to minimise their consumption of electricity, water and materials, and are provided with recycling facilities to reduce waste.

-   Rechargeable battery recycling: Collection points for rechargeable battery recycling have been provided, and tenants are encouraged to use these facilities for battery disposal. Certain materials in rechargeable batteries, such as cadmium, are hazardous to human health and the environment.

An effective environmental management system has been implemented. Some of the Company's main environmental objectives in its property management activities are as follows:

-   using pesticides and cleansing agents in accordance with relevant regulations, and aiming for zero adverse incidents involving their use and storage; and

-   managing community wastewater, waste and noise according to local standards.

Regulatory compliance

The Company is not aware of any non-compliance with environmental regulatory requirements that may significantly impact its business.

2.3 Climate risk

We have considered climate risk and concluded that there is no material impact on the Annual Report.

3   Social responsibility and supply chain management

The Company strongly believes that quality property is a pathway to quality living. It strives to provide a quality property experience through innovation and sensitivity, and by operating with integrity. Through such efforts, its aim is to enhance residents' quality of life and become their trusted partner.

3.1 Supply chain management

During the process of property construction and redevelopment, the Company carefully appoints external contractors by taking into consideration factors such as human rights protection, non-discrimination in employment and occupation, environmental protection, construction safety and product safety. When selecting contractors for property construction, the Company seeks contractors that are familiar with environmental, social and safety requirements, and which are committed to the abolition of child labour and corruption. The Company maintains close relations with contractors relating to all construction and sourcing activities, holding regular meetings to facilitate two-way communication. It also performs regular assessments of contractors based on environmental and social risk considerations.

3.2 Quality services

To ensure consistently high quality in its property management services, the Company aims to:

-   develop quality properties that embrace innovation and enhance their locales;

-   provide committed service and improve its property management offering on an ongoing basis;

-   achieve high standards by thorough rigorous property management practices to maximise customer satisfaction; and

-   provide a tasteful living environment for residents.

3.3 Protection of privacy

To ensure residents' wellbeing, regular communication is maintained through satisfaction surveys that help to identify potential areas for improvement. Residents' identities are kept confidential and access to information gathered is restricted.

Regulatory Compliance

The Company is not aware of any non-compliance with supply chain management regulations that may significantly impact its business.

4   Human rights and labour

The Company strongly believes that businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally recognised human rights.

4.1 Gender Equality and Diversity

To ensure that we have an equitable platform to perform, the Company aims to:

-   ensure the hiring process is performance-based despite gender;

-   ensure there is diverse gender representation at all levels of the Company. (as of June 2024, one of our three board members is female); and

-   ensure our service providers embrace diversity in their workforces.

Abbreviations and acronyms

Manager and Adviser

Manager

The day-to-day responsibility for the management of the Macau Property Opportunities Fund's ("MPO", "Company" or "Group") portfolio rests with Sniper Capital Limited.

Founded in 2004, Sniper Capital Limited focuses on capital growth from carefully selected investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in niche and undervalued property markets.

Sniper Capital Limited's team of over 25 professionals covers all the required investment and development disciplines, including research, site acquisition, project development, asset management, divestment, investor relations and finance.

Working closely with Headland Developments Limited and Bela Vista Property Services Limited, Sniper Capital Limited ensures that all necessary project management skills and services are provided in a way that will enable divestment of properties in an orderly and optimal manner.

With its 29 August 2024 holding of 12.08 million shares or 19.54% of the Company's issued share capital, Sniper Investments Limited - an investment vehicle associated with Sniper Capital Limited - is the largest shareholder in MPO, which bears witness to Sniper Capital Limited's belief in the Company.

The Manager is committed to dispose of the Company's Portfolio in full while striving to return maximum possible values to shareholders.

Adviser

The Company's Board of Directors and Manager are advised by Sniper Capital (Macau) Limited, which has a highly developed network of contacts and associates spanning Macau's financial and business community.

The Investment Adviser provides professional services to the Company including sourcing, analysing and recommending potential divestment opportunities, whilst also providing the Board with property investment and management advisory services in relation to the Company's real estate assets.

For more information, please visit www.snipercapital.com

Investment Policy

The Company is managed with the objective of realising the value of all remaining assets in the portfolio, individually, in aggregate or in any other combination of disposals or transaction structures, in a prudent manner consistent with the principles of sound investment management with a view to making an orderly return of capital to shareholders at the earliest opportunity.

The Company may sell or otherwise realise its investments (including individually, or in aggregate or other combinations) to such persons as it chooses, but in all cases with the objective of achieving the best exit values reasonably available within shortest acceptable time scales.

The Company has ceased to make any new investments and will not undertake additional borrowing other than to refinance existing borrowing or for short-term working capital purposes.

Any net cash received by the Company after discharging any relevant loans as part of the realisation process will be held by the Company as cash on deposit and/or as cash equivalents prior to its distribution to shareholders.

The Company's Articles of Incorporation do not contain any restriction on borrowings externally.

Directors' Report

The Directors present their report and audited financial statements of the Group for the year ended 30 June 2024. This Directors' report should be read together with Corporate Governance Report.

Principal activities

Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited (the "Company") is a company incorporated in Guernsey on 18 May 2006 and is a registered closed-ended investment fund traded on the London Stock Exchange (the "LSE"). Following the passing of all resolutions at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 June 2010, the Company's shares obtained a Premium Listing on the LSE Main Market on 30 June 2010. On 29 July 2024 the UK Listing Rules were updated and as a result, the Company is now a member of the Equity Shares in Commercial Companies ("ESCC") Category and maintains its status as a closed-ended investment fund.

The Company is an authorised entity under the Authorised Closed-Ended Investment Schemes Rules and Guidance, 2021 and is regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission ("GFSC"). During the year, the principal activities of the Company and its subsidiaries as listed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (together referred to as the "Group") were property investment in Macau.

Business review

A review of the business during the year, together with likely future developments, is contained in the Chairman's Message and in the Manager's Report.

Going concern

The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, are set out in the Manager's Report. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and its liquidity position are described in the Capital Management section of the Manager's Report.

The financial risk management objectives and policies of the Group and the exposure of the Group to credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In accordance with provision 30 of the 2018 revision of the UK Corporate Governance Code, (the "UK Code"), and as a fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, the Directors have assessed as to whether the Company will continue in existence as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from signing of the financial statements, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis for the reasons set out below and as the Directors, with recommendation from the Audit and Risk Committee, have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the next twelve months after date of approval of the Annual Report.

In reaching its conclusion, the Board have considered the risks that could impact the Group's liquidity over the period to 30 September 2025. This period represents the period of at least 12 months from the date of signing of the Annual Report.

As part of their assessment the Audit and Risk Committee highlighted the following key considerations:

1. Whether the Group can repay or refinance its loan facilities to discharge its liabilities over the period to 30 September 2025

2. Extension of life of the Company

1.  Whether the Group can repay or refinance its loan facilities to discharge its liabilities over the period to 30 September 2025

As at 30 June 2024, the Group has major debt obligations to settle during the going concern period being:

i)   principal repayments for The Waterside loan facility of US$11.5 million, US$16.0 million and US$39.8 million due for settlement in September 2024, March 2025 and September 2025, respectively;

ii)  principal repayments for The Fountainside loan facility of US$0.7 million due for settlement in December 2024;

iii) principal repayments for the Penha Heights Tai Fung Bank loan facility of US$2.2 million due for settlement in two instalments of US$0.65 million each in September 2024 and December 2024 and three instalments of US$0.3 million each thereafter in March 2025, June 2025 and September 2025, respectively; and

iv)  principal repayments for the Penha Heights BCM loan facility of US$0.4 million, US$0.4 million and US$6.9 million due for settlement in March 2025, June 2025 and September 2025, respectively.

The Waterside and The Fountainside

Given that the Macau Special Administrative Region Government have now revoked all the property cooling measures which had been in place for 3 years and the current staggered Macau economic recovery, it is assumed that MPO can achieve a rate of 2 Waterside unit disposals per month from August 2024 to September 2025. This would generate US$79.5 million of revenue referenced to current valuations and pricing strategy which would be sufficient to cover the instalments for both the Waterside and Fountainside facilities due for repayment in the upcoming twelve months period as well as MPO's operating expenses.

Loan repayments to Hang Seng Bank for the Waterside facilities in September 2024 of US$11.5 million, was settled through disposal proceeds from the Waterside units. In addition, an advance payment of US$1.7 million loan amount has also been prepaid to Hang Seng Bank in September 2024.

Penha Heights

The loan repayments for the two Penha Heights facilities that would become due over the going concern period total US$9.9 million. It is anticipated that this would be settled from sales proceeds of Waterside and Fountainside units, in the event that Penha Heights is not disposed of during the period.

Penha Heights loan repayment of US$0.65 million has been settled in accordance to loan repayment term in September 2024.

Relationship with Lenders

The Manager is responsible for maintaining relationship with the Group's lenders, for monitoring compliance with loan terms and covenants and reporting to the Board on matters arising. Throughout the year ended 30 June 2024 and up to the date of issue of the financial statements, the Group has continued to be in compliance with loan covenants and the Manager has maintained frequent ongoing dialogue with all lenders who have demonstrated strong support for the Group and its measured divestment strategy over the years.

Given the debt obligations that will become due for settlement over the going concern period are expected to be covered by proceeds from selling Waterside units at a conservative modest rate and potential sales of Fountainside units. The fact that all banking facilities of the Group have all been successfully renewed previously, with the loan-to-value ratios of the facilities maintained within the covenants required under the respective loan agreements, the Board is confident that the Group would be able to meet its debt obligations during the going concern period.

Notwithstanding the above, given that it remains uncertain that adequate proceeds could be generated from sales of properties to settle payment obligations over the going concern period, and given that any necessary refinancing of debt obligations would still be subjected to lenders' approval, the Directors consider that there is a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt over the Group's and Company's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.

2.  Extension of life of the Company

After the Ordinary Resolution was passed at the Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of the Company in its 2023 AGM to extend the Fund's life until the 2024 AGM (expected to be held by December 2024), the Directors assessed the impact of the continuation vote on the Fund's ability to continue as a going concern. The Directors have also considered the going concern assumption outside the primary going concern horizon. In line with Article 38 of the Articles of Incorporation, the Company will put forward a resolution for its continuation at the next AGM (to be held by December 2024). If any continuation resolution is not passed, the Directors are required to formulate proposals to be put to Members to reorganise, unitise, reconstruct or wind up the Company. The Directors expect to receive continuation support from major shareholders based upon ongoing communications and note that 50% of shareholder support is required to ensure continuation. It is likely that returns from the sale of properties would be significantly lower, as endorsed by the recent forced sales imposed on developers, if the Fund was forced to sell as a result of a failed continuation vote from shareholders and it is therefore commercially sensible for the Fund to continue in business. Given that the continuation vote has not taken place at the date of issue of the financial statements, the Directors consider that there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.

Going Concern Conclusion

After careful consideration and based on the reasons outlined above, including the Manager's continuing dialogue with lenders and shareholders, whilst there are material uncertainties related to going concern, the Board have a reasonable expectation that the Company will continue in existence as a going concern for 12 months from the date of signing the Annual report. They are therefore satisfied that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

Viability Statement

The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity. The Directors consider each of the Company's principal risks and uncertainties, during the quarterly Board meetings, supported by the twice monthly reporting from the Manager. The Directors also considered the Company's policy for monitoring, managing and mitigating its exposure to these risks and the impact on the Company's operations. This assessment involved an evaluation of the potential impact on the Company of these risks occurring. Where appropriate, the Company's financial modelling was subject to a sensitivity analysis involving flexing a number of key assumptions in the underlying financial forecasts in order to analyse the effect on the Company's net cash flows and other key financial ratios. A base case and adverse scenario where projections calculated based upon flexing these key assumptions had both resulted in positive cash held balances throughout the two-year projection period with ending cash balances of over US$2 million under both scenarios with proceeds generated from disposal of assets sufficient to cover all liabilities. The Board expects the payments obligation of the loan facilities which will be due within the next 12 months will be repaid while the Company continues to comply with the loan covenants and that the Company's life will be further extended at the 2024 AGM.

In accordance with provision 31 of the 2018 revision of the UK Code, the Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company over a longer period than the 12 months required by the going concern provision. During the year, the Board conducted a review for a period covering two years, including a review of a comprehensive cash flow projection, together with adverse scenarios to stress test the cash positions of the Company. The Board considered two years to be an appropriate time horizon for its divestment plan, being the period over which the majority of the Company's properties should have been disposed of. This has rolled forward for another 6-9 months from last year due to the high interest rate environment and the near term impact of the post easing of restrictions triggering sales by developers which has caused the slow economic and business recovery and weakened sentiment. Were circumstances to allow, the Company would look to make early repayments of debt, subject to any penalty for doing so, if sales velocity can be accelerated. Based on an assessment of the principal risks facing the Company and the stress testing based assessment of the Company's prospects, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation (subject to the Continuation Vote and projected sales) and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the two-year period of their assessment. It is expected that the timeframe for the disposal of the majority of the assets will be within the remaining two-year period.

Share capital

Ordinary Shares

The Company has one class of ordinary shares, which carries no rights to fixed income. On a show of hands, each member - present in person or by proxy - has the right to one vote at general meetings. On a poll, each member is entitled to one vote for every share held.

The Company's Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation contain details relating to the rules that the Company has regarding the appointment and removal of Directors or amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation.

Results and dividends

The results for the year are set out in the Consolidated Financial Statements. There are no dividends proposed or declared for the current year end (2023: US$ nil).

Management fee revision

During the course of 2023 as Macau transitioned away from the strict COVID-19 restrictions imposed by the Chinese government, the economy gained momentum, driven by strong gaming revenues and increased visitor numbers. Despite this broadly positive backdrop, the property market - especially the higher-end luxury segment - was slower to respond as favourably as other areas of the economy, as a degree of caution remained. Accordingly, while progress with disposals was made during the year the Board deemed it necessary to extend the management arrangements whilst repositioning the fees payable to incentivise the Manager to achieve substantial sales during 2024. The Board's view remains unchanged that the Manager's knowledge of the Company's portfolio of assets and the Macau market is key to the successful delivery of the divestment strategy.

The Board has agreed to amend the terms of the Investment Management Agreement with the Manager, with effect (retrospectively) from 1 January 2024 as follows:

• From 1 January 2024 and continuing during the remainder of calendar year 2024, a management fee of US$100,000 per month will continue to be payable to the Manager, with the realisation fee continuing on the same terms as in 2023 and using the 30 September 2019 valuation basis for determining the realisation fee hurdle.

• Fees continue to be subject to an overall cap per annum set at 4.99% of the lower of market capitalisation and net asset value (the "Cap"). This is based on the market capitalisation on the day immediately prior to signing the amendment agreement in respect of calendar year 2024 and will be reset for any following year based on the market capitalisation or net asset value (as applicable) at close of business on the last business day of the previous calendar year. The Cap for 2024 is accordingly set at US$1,439,816.

• At the option of the Board, the monthly management fee may be reduced to US$80,000 per month in respect of any monthly period beginning on or after 1 January 2025, with one month's advance notice given to the Manager.

• For calendar year 2025 and thereafter, the realisation fee hurdle will be rebased by reference to the carrying value of the Company's portfolio of assets as at 31 December 2024, but subject to divestment hurdles being reached in 2024, in line with an agreed divestment plan.

• For calendar year 2025 and thereafter, the realisation fee will be 2.5% of the net realisation proceeds if the sale price achieved is greater than 90% of the carrying value, with the removal of the 80%-90% performance hurdle band.

The Investment Management Agreement (as amended) will continue throughout the divestment period, but with effect from 1 January 2025, the notice period to terminate the Agreement by each party will be reduced to 3 months.

The Board considers the arrangements to be fair given the context of the continued challenging property market and they are intended to ensure that the Manager is able to continue to operate and remains incentivised to deliver realisations on behalf of the Company and its shareholders. The changes to the fee arrangements constitute a smaller related party transaction under the Listing Rules, and the Company has obtained written confirmation from its Sponsor that the terms are fair and reasonable insofar as the Company's shareholders are concerned.

Authority to purchase own shares

Following the authority first granted in the Extraordinary General Meeting on 28 June 2010 and subsequently renewed at each AGM, the Board has publicly stated its commitment to undertake share buybacks at attractive levels of discount of the share price to Adjusted NAV. The Board intends to renew this authority at the 2024 AGM. No shares have been repurchased in the current or prior financial year.

Significant shareholdings

As at 29 August 2024, a total of 10 shareholders each held more than 3% of the issued ordinary shares of the Company, accounting for a total of 49,850,654 shares (29 August 2023: 45,484,753) or 80.62% (29 August 2023: 73.56%) of the issued share capital. Significant shareholdings as at 29 August 2024 are detailed below:

Directors

Biographies of the Directors who served during the year and up to the date of this report are detailed above.

Directors' interests

Directors who held office during the year and had interests in the shares of the Company as at 30 June 2024 were:

There have been no changes to the aforementioned interests since 30 June 2024.

Non-mainstream pooled investments

The Board notes the changes to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules ("UK Listing Rules") relating to the restrictions on the retail distribution of unregulated collective investments schemes and close substitutes which came into effect on 1 January 2014.

Following the receipt of legal advice, the Board confirms that it has conducted the Company's affairs in such a manner that the Company would have qualified for approval as an investment trust if it was resident in the United Kingdom, and that it is the Board's intention that the Company will continue to conduct its affairs in such a manner. Thus, the Company is, and the Board expects it will continue to be, outside the scope of the new restrictions and Independent Financial Advisors (IFAs) should therefore be able to recommend ordinary shares in the Company to retail investors in accordance with the FCA requirements relating to non-mainstream investment products.

Directors' remuneration

Directors of the Company are all non-executive and, by way of remuneration, receive an annual fee set in Sterling. During the year, the Directors received the following emoluments in the form of Directors' fees from the Company. There has been no change in director remuneration since 2017 with any annual differences the result of foreign exchange fluctuations.

Directors' Responsibilities to Stakeholders

Section 172 of the UK Companies Act 2006 applies directly to UK domiciled companies. Nonetheless the AIC Code requires that the matters set out in section 172 are reported on by all companies, irrespective of domicile.

Section 172 recognises that directors are responsible for acting in a way that they consider, in good faith, is the most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its stakeholders as a whole. In doing so, they are also required to consider the broader implications of their decisions and operations on other key stakeholders and their impact on the wider community and the environment. Key decisions are those that are either material to the Company or are significant to any of the Company's key stakeholders. The Company's engagement with key stakeholders and the key decisions that were made or approved by the Directors during the year are described below.

Change of control

There are no agreements that the Company considers significant and to which the Company is party, that would take effect, alter or terminate upon change of control of the Company, following a takeover bid.

Annual General Meeting

The AGM of the Company will be held in December 2024 at Floor 2, Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey. A notice of Meeting and Agenda will be released before December 2024 AGM.

Independent auditors

The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the appointment of the external auditor, its effectiveness and its relationship with the Group, which includes monitoring the use of the external auditor for non-audit services and the balance of audit and non-audit fees paid. Deloitte LLP have been appointed as external auditor for the year to 30 June 2024. Each Director believes that there is no relevant information of which the external auditor is unaware. Each has taken all steps necessary, as a director, to be aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that Deloitte LLP is made aware of any pertinent information. This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 249 of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.

Subsequent events

Significant subsequent events have been disclosed in Note 25.

Financial risk management policies and objectives

Financial risk management policies and objectives are disclosed in Note 2.

Principal risks and uncertainties

Principal risks and uncertainties are discussed in the Corporate Governance Report.

On behalf of the Board

Mark Huntley

Chairman of the Board

27 September 2024

Corporate Governance Report

The Board has put in place a framework for corporate governance which it believes is appropriate for an investment company. Paragraph 6.6.6R of the UK Listing Rules obliges Boards to report upon their corporate governance arrangements against the UK Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council (the "FRC"). The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies (the "AIC") and the Board has considered the principles and recommendations of the 2019 AIC's Code of Corporate Governance ("AIC Code"). The Board considers that reporting against the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code provides better information to shareholders. The FRC has provided the AIC with an endorsement letter to cover the latest edition of the AIC Code. The endorsement confirms that by following the AIC Code, investment company boards should fully meet their obligations in relation to the UK Code and paragraph 6.6.6R of the UK Listing Rules.

The AIC Code is available on the AIC's website, www.theaic.co.uk. The UK Code is available on the FRC's website, www.frc.org.uk.

Throughout the accounting period, the Company has complied with the recommendations of the AIC Code and thus the relevant provisions of Section 1 of the UK Code, except as set out below.

The UK Code includes provisions relating to:

• the role of the chief executive;

• executive directors' remuneration;

• the need for an internal audit function;

• appointment of a senior independent director; and

• whistleblowing policy.

The Board considers that the above provisions, where practical, have been fully adhered to but many are not currently relevant to the position of the Company which delegates most day-to-day functions to third parties. There are areas of governance codes which present genuine practical challenges for a company that is in the late stage of life, with a clearly defined but narrow strategic objective. All Directors are non-executive and independent of the Investment Adviser and therefore the Directors consider the Company has no requirement for a Chief Executive or a Senior Independent Director and the Board is satisfied that any relevant issues can be properly considered by the Board. The absence of an internal audit function is discussed in the Report of the Audit and Risk Committee.

The GFSC Finance Sector Code of Corporate Governance (the "GFSC Code") came into force in Guernsey on 1 January 2012 and was amended in February 2016, June 2021 and November 2021. The Company is deemed to satisfy the GFSC Code provided that it continues to conduct its governance in accordance with the requirements of the AIC Code.

Except as disclosed below, the Company complied throughout the year with the recommendations of the AIC Code and the relevant provisions of the UK Code.

The Board

The Board consists of three non-executive directors, all of whom are independent of the Company's Manager and Investment Adviser.

Directors' details are listed above which set out the range of investment, financial and business skills and experience represented. Provision 14 of the AIC Code states that a Board should consider appointing one independent non-executive director to be the senior independent director. The Board, having taken into account its small size and that all directors are each similarly independent and non-executive, considers it unnecessary to appoint a senior independent director.

All Directors will retire annually in accordance with the AIC Code. A retiring director shall be eligible for reappointment. No director shall be required to vacate his office at any time by reason of the fact that they have attained any specific age.

The Board has considered the need for a policy regarding tenure of office and a succession plan for the retirement of Directors; however, the Board believes that any decisions regarding tenure should consider the need for continuity and maintenance of knowledge and experience and to balance this against the need to periodically refresh Board's composition, with the limited expected life of the Company in mind. Alan Clifton has been a member of the Board for 18 years. However, the Board have satisfied themselves that Alan Clifton continues to be independent in approach and judgement. The Board are satisfied that Alan Clifton remains completely independent of the Investment Manager and provides consistency and continuity in the current realisation phase of the Company.

The Company has benefitted greatly from the knowledge, expertise and skill mix of the Board as it has had to navigate through the difficulties of the current situation. Whilst there are no concerns about either stale behaviour or lack of vigour to deliver the Company's strategy, any appointment of a director requires a sound understanding and knowledge of the market in Macau as well as broader experience of the real estate market: to the contrary, the Board and Manager dynamics have been most constructive and measured in the face of an unprecedented challenges.

The majority of the Board is independent within the meaning of the AIC Code.

The Board meets at least four times a year for regular scheduled meetings and, should the nature of the activity of the Company require it, additional meetings may be held, some at short notice. At each meeting, the Board follows a formal agenda that covers the business to be discussed.

To fulfil the recommendation of AIC Code Provision 15 and to give sufficient attention to strategy, the Board discusses strategy at each of its regular scheduled meetings, but holds a separate session annually devoted to this.

Between meetings, there is regular contact with the Manager and the Administrator, and the Board requires to be supplied in a timely manner with information by the Manager, the Company Secretary and other advisers in a form and of a quality to enable it to discharge its duties.

The terms and conditions of appointment of non-executive directors are available for inspection from the Company's registered office.

Performance and evaluation

Pursuant to Principle J of the AIC Code, which requires a formal and rigorous annual evaluation of its performance, the Board formally reviews its performance annually through an internal process. Internal evaluation of the Board, the Audit and Risk Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Management Engagement Committee, the Disclosure and Communications Committee and individual Directors has taken the form of self-appraisal questionnaires and detailed discussions to determine effectiveness and performance in various areas, as well as the Directors' continued independence. Given the late stage of life of the Company, the Board considered it sufficient to undertake its own evaluation rather than appointing, at cost, an external facilitator.

During the year, a formal board performance appraisal was carried out by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Following review and collation of the results, the Board considered that the overall performance of the Board during the year had been satisfactory and that the Board is confident in its ability to continue effectively to lead the Company and oversee its affairs. The Board believes that the current mix of skills, experience, knowledge and location of the Directors is appropriate to the requirements of the Company.

Any new directors, were they to be appointed, would receive an induction from the Manager as part of the familiarisation process of candidates following appointment. All directors receive other relevant training as necessary.

Duties and responsibilities

The Board is responsible to shareholders for the overall management of the Company. The Board has adopted a Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board which sets out the particular duties of the Board. Such reserved powers include decisions relating to the determination of investment policy and approval of investments, strategy, capital raising, statutory obligations and public disclosure, financial reporting and entering into any material contracts by the Company.

The Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary and Administrator, who are responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and that it complies with Guernsey Law and applicable rules and regulations of the GFSC and the LSE. Where necessary, in carrying out their duties, the Directors may seek independent professional advice at the expense of the Company. The Company maintains appropriate Directors' and Officers' liability insurance in respect of legal action against its Directors on an on-going basis.

The Board has responsibility for ensuring that the Company keeps proper accounting records, which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company, and which enable it to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.

The Board has responsibility for ensuring that the Annual Report presents a fair, balanced and understandable assessment of the Company's position and prospects. This responsibility extends to interim and other price-sensitive public reports.

Committees of the Board

Nomination and Remuneration Committee

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee Report is below.

Management Engagement Committee

The Management Engagement Committee Report is below .

Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee Report is below .

Meeting Attendance

Internal control and financial reporting

The Board is responsible for the Group's system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness, and the Board has, therefore, established a process designed to meet the particular needs of the Group in managing the risks to which it is exposed.

The process takes a risk-based approach to internal control through a matrix which identifies the key functions carried out by the Manager and other key service providers, the various activities undertaken within those functions, the risks associated with each activity and the controls employed to minimise those risks. A residual risk rating is then applied. Regular reports are provided to the Board, highlighting material changes to risk ratings and a formal review of these procedures is carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee and reported to the Board on an annual basis and has been completed during the financial year. By their nature, these procedures provide a reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss.

At each board meeting, the Board also monitors the Group's investment performance and activities since the last board meeting to ensure that the Manager adheres to the agreed investment policy and approved investment guidelines. Furthermore, at each board meeting, the Board receives reports from the Company Secretary and Administrator in respect of compliance matters and duties performed on behalf of the Company.

The Board considers that an internal audit function specific to the Group is unnecessary and that the systems and procedures employed by the Administrator and Manager, including their own internal control functions, provide sufficient assurance that a sound system of internal control, which safeguards the Group's assets, is maintained. The Administrator issues a SOC 1 report annually, setting out a description of controls and detailed external testing of the controls over a year. The serving auditor concluded in the most recent report that control objectives were suitably designed and achieved during the period. Investment advisory services are provided to the Group by Sniper Capital (Macau) Limited. The Board is responsible for setting the overall investment policy and monitors the action of the Manager at regular board meetings. The Board has also delegated administration and company secretarial services to Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited but retains accountability for all functions it delegates.

Management agreement

The Company has entered into an agreement with the Manager. This sets out the Manager's key responsibilities, which include proposing the property investment strategy to the Board and identifying property investments to recommend for divestment. The Manager is also responsible to the Board for all issues relating to property asset management. The management agreement is aimed at delivering a complete divestment of the remaining properties held and the return of capital to shareholders.

The Company has delegated the provision of all services to external service providers whose work is overseen by the Management Engagement Committee at its regular scheduled meetings. Each calendar year, a detailed review of performance pursuant to their terms of engagement is undertaken by the Management Engagement Committee.

In accordance with Listing Rule 11.7.2.(2)R and having formally appraised the performance and resources of the Manager, in the opinion of the Directors, the continuing appointment of the Manager, on the terms agreed, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole.

Relations with shareholders

The Company welcomes the views of shareholders and places great importance on communication with its shareholders. Senior members of the Manager are available at all reasonable times to meet with principal shareholders and key sector analysts. The Manager, Chairman and other Directors are not only available to meet with shareholders, but have actively done so.

Reports on the views of shareholders are provided to the Board on a regular basis. The Board is also kept fully informed of all relevant market commentary on the Company by the Manager and the Corporate Broker.

All shareholders can address their individual concerns to the Company in writing at its registered address. The AGM of the Company provides a forum for shareholders to meet and discuss issues with the Directors and the Manager. The Manager and Board also engage with shareholders on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Company maintains a website (www.mpofund.com) which contains comprehensive information, including company notifications, share information, financial reports, investment objectives and policy, investor contacts and information on the Board and corporate governance.

Whistleblowing

The Board has considered the AIC Code recommendations in respect of arrangements by which staff of the Administrator and Investment Manager may, in confidence, raise concerns within their respective organisations about possible improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other matters.

It has concluded that adequate arrangements are in place for the proportionate and independent investigation of such matters and, where necessary, for appropriate follow-up action to be taken within their organisation.

GDPR

The Board confirmed that the Company has considered GDPR and taken measures itself and with its service providers to meet the requirements of GDPR and the equivalent Guernsey law.

Cyber-security

The Board recognises the increased incidence of cyber-security threats and regularly reviews its policies, procedures and defences to mitigate associated risks, and receives confirmation on such matters such as quarterly compliance reports, from the key service providers.

Principal risks and uncertainties

The Group's assets consist of residential property investments in Macau. Its principal risks are therefore related to the residential property market in general, but also the particular circumstances of the properties in which they are invested and where relevant, their tenants. The Manager seeks to mitigate these risks through active asset management initiatives and carrying out due diligence work on potential tenants before entering into any new lease agreements. All the properties in the portfolio are insured.

Each Director is aware of the risks inherent in the Group's business and understands the importance of identifying and evaluating these risks. The Board has adopted procedures and controls that enable it to manage these risks within acceptable limits and to meet all its legal and regulatory obligations.

For each material risk, the likelihood and consequence are identified, management controls and frequency of monitoring are confirmed and results are reported and discussed at board meetings.

The Company's principal risk factors are fully discussed in the Company's prospectus, are available on the Company's website and should be reviewed by shareholders. Note 2 further describes the Group's risk management processes.

The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group are set out below:

• The ongoing cash flow and financing issues which are faced by the Group. The Manager undertakes ongoing discussions with lenders to enable relief of the stress on cash flow. The Manager provides the Board with fortnightly updates with divestments progress and payable status reporting, bringing up-to-date information to the Board. Working capital requirements, cashflows scenarios and an analysis of loan to value covenants are reported to the Board for monitoring.

• Economic changes that have occurred since 2023 such as high global inflation, interest rate increases and their impact on the Macau economy and in particular, the luxury property market. The Manager provides regular and timely updates on developments and ad-hoc analysis about such economic related impact to the Board, to facilitate their informed decision making process and allow sales strategy to be pivoted as required;

• There can be no guarantee that Macau will remain the only centre in China where gambling is legal. Other centres are unlikely to be created, however, in the expected remaining life of the Company. Changes in policies of the government or changes in laws and regulations may result in the legalisation of gambling in other parts of China in the longer term. Other regional centres may also provide increased competition to Macau. These, in turn, may have an adverse effect on Macau's economy and property market and the favourable treatment of gambling in Macau. There is an inherent risk in investing in the Macau region which cannot be mitigated or managed by the Board.

• The Group's loan refinancing may not be available in the future due to reduced lending appetite from banks and a change in market sentiment. The Board, through the Manager, has an ongoing dialogue with all external lenders and closely monitors the loan covenants of all facilities.

• Inability to achieve the Group's strategic objectives, linked to a widening of the discount between share price and Adjusted NAV. The Continuation Vote in the AGM in December 2024, given the concentrated shareholder base which exists, represents an uncertainty. The Board, the Manager and the Company maintain good relationships with investors through periodic contact, investor updates, and addressing influences on the share price and through provision of factual information to support any resolutions requiring shareholders' approval.

• New legislation or regulations, or different or more stringent interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations, in any jurisdiction in which the Group operates, may have a material adverse effect on the Group's financial performance and returns to shareholders. The Manager provides the Board with updates on any relevant development on a regular basis.

• Macau law governs the majority of the Group's agreements which relate to property investments, property ownership rights and securities. It cannot be guaranteed that the Group will be able to enforce any such agreements or that remedies will be available outside of Macau. The Manager provides the Board with updates on any concerning developments on a regular basis.

• The Group's return on its investments and prospects are subject to economic, legal, political and social developments in Macau and China, and the Asia Pacific region in general. The Manager provides the Board with updates on any concerning developments on a regular basis. In particular, the Group's return on its investments may be adversely affected by:

• changes in Macau's and China's political, economic and social conditions;

• changes in policies of the government or changes in laws and regulations (including the revocation or modification by the Chinese Government of Macau's SAR status and high autonomy levels), or the interpretation of laws and regulations;

• changes in foreign exchange rates or regulations;

• measures that may be introduced to control inflation, such as interest rate increases;

• changes in the rate or method of taxation;

• title and/or legal disputes with neighbouring land owners and legal disputes with architects, project managers and suppliers;

• changes to restrictions on or regulations concerning repatriation of funds; and

• pressure to sell on developers.

Emerging risks

Emerging risks have been identified by the Board through a process of evaluating which of the principal risks or any previously unidentified risks have increased materially through the year and/or are expected to grow significantly and such evaluation is completed at regular Board meetings. Any such emerging risks are likely to cause disruption to the Group's business. If ignored, there could be significant impact on the Group's financial situation and future operating performance but, if recognised, they could provide opportunities for transformation. In the current year no further emerging risks have been identified.

There is a process for identifying, evaluating and managing the principal and emerging risks faced by the Group. This process (which accords with the FRC's "Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting") has been regularly reviewed and has been in place throughout the financial year and up to the date of approval of these annual accounts.

The above principal risks are mitigated and managed by the Board through continual review, policy setting and annual updating of the Group's risk matrix to ensure that procedures are in place with the intention of minimising the impact of the above-mentioned risks should they crystallise. The Board relies on reports periodically provided by the Administrator and the Manager regarding risks that the Group faces. When required, experts are employed to gather information, including tax advisers, legal advisers and planning advisers. Some risks are, however, beyond the Board or Managers' ability to mitigate.

The Board relies on the Manager's close relationship with legal and other professionals in Macau, Hong Kong and China to keep abreast of any potential changes to the law and any possible impact on the Group. The Board also regularly monitors the investment environment and the management of the Group's property portfolio, and applies the principles detailed in the internal control guidance issued by the FRC. Details of the Group's internal controls are described in more detail above.

The Group's financial risks and uncertainties are further discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On behalf of the Board

Mark Huntley

Chairman of the Board

27 September 2024

Nomination and Remuneration Committee Report

Summary of the role of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee regularly reviews the structure, size and composition (including the skills, knowledge, gender, experience and diversity) of the Board and makes recommendations to the Board with regard to any required changes and also considers the appropriate levels of the Board's remuneration. The Board monitors the developments in corporate governance to ensure the Board remains aligned with best practice. The Board acknowledges the importance of diversity of experience, approach and gender for the effective functioning of a board and commits to supporting diversity in the boardroom. The Board also values diversity of business skills and experience because directors with diverse skills sets, capabilities and experience gained from different geographical backgrounds enhance the Board by bringing a wide range of perspectives to the Company. The Board is satisfied with the current composition and functioning of its members. It is the Company's policy to give careful consideration to issues of the Board's balance, including gender and ethnic diversity, when appointing board members, but its priority is to appoint based on merit, notwithstanding a strong desire to maintain the Board's diversity. The Board's current ethnic diversity ratio is 33.33% and current gender diversity ratio is 33.33%. The terms of reference are considered annually by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and are then referred to the Board for approval and are available on the Company's website. The Board's approach to succession takes into account of the fact that the Company is in the final phase of its life.

Remuneration

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee determines and agrees with the Board the remuneration of the Company's Chairman, and non-executive directors. No director shall be involved in any decisions as to their own remuneration. In determining such remuneration, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee takes into account all factors which it deems necessary including any relevant legal requirements, the provisions and recommendations in the AIC Code of Corporate Governance and the UK Listing Authority's Listing Rules and associated guidance. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee also obtains reliable, up-to-date information about remuneration in other comparable companies. There have been no changes to annual director remuneration since 2017.

Composition of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee

The members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee are listed below.

Meetings

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee meets at least once a calendar year and otherwise as required. Meetings of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall be called by the Company Secretary at the request of the Committee Chairman. Unless otherwise agreed, notice of each meeting confirming the venue, time and date, together with an agenda of items to be discussed, shall be forwarded to each member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, any other person required to attend and all other non-executive directors, no later than five working days before the date of the meeting. Supporting papers shall be sent to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and to other attendees as appropriate, at the same time. Any non-executive director who is not considered independent will not take part in the Nomination and Remuneration Committee's deliberations regarding remuneration levels.

Consideration of Directors for re-election

All Directors will retire annually in accordance with the AIC Code. A retiring director shall be eligible for reappointment. No director shall be required to vacate his office at any time by reason of the fact that he has attained any specific age.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee will consider the use of external consultants to assist with the appointment of future directors.

Overview

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee did not meet during the year ended 30 June 2024, however, it has met subsequent to the year end. Matters considered at the meeting included but were not limited to:

• the structure, size and composition (including the balance of skills, knowledge, experience and diversity) of the Board and Audit and Risk Committee and the need periodically to refresh membership;

• to note guidance set out in the AIC Code;

• to consider key outcomes from the Board's evaluation process;

• to consider Board's tenure and succession planning;

• consideration of Directors for re-election

• consideration of Directors' remuneration; and

• consideration of the effectiveness of new Directors.

As a result of its work during the year, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee has concluded that it has acted in accordance with its terms of reference.

On behalf of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee

Alan Clifton

Chairman of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee

27 September 2024

Management Engagement Committee Report

Summary of the role of the Management Engagement Committee

The Management Engagement Committee annually reviews the terms of the Investment Management Agreement between the Company and the Manager and reviews the performance and terms of engagement of any other key service providers to the Company, as detailed in Appendix 1 of the Terms of Reference of the Committee. The terms of reference are considered annually by the Management Engagement Committee and are then referred to the Board for approval and are available on the Company's website. During the year the Management Agreement was amended to extend the Manager's entitlement to earn fees into 2024 in reflection of the delays to the realisation of assets arising as a consequence of the coronavirus pandemic and the challenging subsequent trading conditions. The maximum fee that could be paid to the Manager in all circumstances is US$1,439,816.

Composition of the Management Engagement Committee

The members of the Management Engagement Committee are listed below.

Meetings

The Management Engagement Committee meets at least once a calendar year and otherwise as required. Meetings of the Management Engagement Committee shall be called by the Company Secretary at the request of the Committee Chairman. Unless otherwise agreed, notice of each meeting confirming the venue, time and date, together with an agenda of items to be discussed, shall be forwarded to each member of the Management Engagement Committee, any other person required to attend, no later than five working days before the date of the meeting. Supporting papers shall be sent to the Management Engagement Committee and to other attendees, as appropriate, at the same time.

Performance of the Manager

Following discussion, it is the opinion of the Management Engagement Committee that the performance of the Manager for the year ended 30 June 2024 was satisfactory and the continuing appointment of the Manager on the terms as currently agreed and, following negotiation and an affirmative Continuation Vote, any future ongoing extension is in the interests of the shareholders as a whole.

Performance of key service providers

Following discussion, it is the opinion of the Management Engagement Committee that the performance of the key service providers (as detailed in Appendix 1 of the Terms of Reference of the Committee) for the year ended 30 June 2024 was satisfactory.

Overview

The Management Engagement Committee did not meet during the year ended 30 June 2024; however it has met subsequent to the year end and as a result of its work, the Management Engagement Committee has concluded that it has acted in accordance with its terms of reference.

On behalf of the Management Engagement Committee

Mark Huntley

Chairman of the Management Engagement Committee

27 September 2024

Audit and Risk Committee Report

Summary of the role of the Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee is appointed by the Board from the non-executive directors of the Company. The Audit and Risk Committee's terms of reference include all matters indicated by Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 7.1 and the UK Code. The terms of reference are considered annually by the Audit and Risk Committee and are then referred to the Board for approval and are available on the Company's website.

The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for:

• reviewing and monitoring the integrity of the Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the Interim Report and Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group, and any formal announcements relating to the Group's financial performance, and reviewing significant financial reporting judgements contained therein;

• reporting to the Board on the appropriateness of the accounting policies and practices including critical accounting policies and practices;

• advising the Board that the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy;

• reviewing the Group's internal financial controls and, unless expressly addressed by the Board itself, the Group's internal controls and principal risks;

• making recommendations to the Board for a resolution to be put to the shareholders, for their approval in general meetings, on the appointment of the external auditor and the approval of the remuneration and terms of engagement of the external auditor;

• reviewing and monitoring the external auditor's independence and objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process, taking into consideration relevant UK professional and regulatory requirements;

• developing and implementing a policy on the engagement of the external auditor to supply non-audit services, taking into account relevant guidance regarding the provision of any non-audit services by the external audit firm;

• reviewing the valuations of the Company's investments prepared by the Investment Adviser, and providing a recommendation to the Board on the valuation of the Company's investments;

• meeting the external auditor to review their proposed audit programme of work and the subsequent audit report and to assess the effectiveness of the audit process and the levels of fees paid in respect of both audit and any non-audit work;

• considering annually whether there is a need for the Company to have its own internal audit function; and

• reviewing and considering the UK Code, the AIC Code and the Stewardship Code.

The Audit and Risk Committee is required to report its findings to the Board, identifying any matters on which it considers that action or improvement is needed, and to make recommendations on the steps to be taken.

The Audit and Risk Committee is also required to report to the Board, identifying how it has discharged its responsibilities during the current year.

The Board has taken note of the requirement that at least one member of the Audit and Risk Committee should have recent and relevant financial experience and is satisfied that the Audit and Risk Committee is properly constituted in that respect, with all members having relevant sector experience.

The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the information contained in the other sections of the Annual Report including the Directors' Report, Chairman's Message and the Manager's Report.

The Audit and Risk Committee is the formal forum through which the external auditor reports to the Board. The external auditor is invited to attend the Audit and Risk Committee meetings at which the Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, and at which they have the opportunity to meet with the Audit and Risk Committee without representatives of the Investment Adviser being present at least once per year.

Composition of the Audit and Risk Committee

The members of the Audit and Risk Committee are:

Appointments to the Audit and Risk Committee will be for a period of up to three years, which is extendable, depending upon members continuing to be independent. Alan Clifton has been a member of the Audit and Risk Committee for 18 years. However, the Board and Audit and Risk Committee have satisfied themselves that Alan Clifton continues to be independent in approach and judgement. The Board are satisfied that Alan Clifton remains completely independent of the Investment Manager and provides consistency and continuity in the current realisation phase of the Company. Accordingly, it has resolved to extend his appointment to the Audit and Risk Committee for a further year. The Board has also considered the inclusion of the Chairman within the Audit and Risk Committee and, having taken into account that the Chairman is independent and non-executive, believes it appropriate for the Chairman to be a member. It is the intention to maintain the majority board independence within the meaning of the AIC Code.

Financial Reporting

The primary role of the Audit and Risk Committee in relation to the financial reporting is to review with the Administrator, Investment Adviser and the external auditor on the appropriateness of the Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Interim Report, concentrating on, among other matters:

• the quality and acceptability of accounting policies and practices;

• the clarity of the disclosures and compliance with financial reporting standards and relevant financial and governance reporting requirements;

• material areas in which significant judgement have been applied or there has been discussion with the external auditor;

• whether the Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for the shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy; and

•    any correspondence from regulators in relation to Company's financial reporting.

To aid its review, the Audit and Risk Committee considers reports from the Administrator, Manager and Investment Adviser and also reports from the external auditor on the outcomes of their annual audit. The Audit and Risk Committee supports Deloitte LLP in displaying the necessary professional scepticism their role requires.

Significant issues considered in relation to the financial statements

The Audit and Risk Committee has had regular contact with the Investment Adviser and the external auditor during the year end audit process. The Committee's discussions have been broad ranging, including the consideration of the Company's going concern status and key areas of judgement.

The Audit and Risk Committee is satisfied, having received advice from professional advisers which include external valuers, tax advisers and lawyers, that these sensitivities have been appropriately reflected and disclosed in the financial statements.

During its review of the Group's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2024, the Audit and Risk Committee considered the following significant issues:

• going concern and viability in relation to the Continuation Vote in December 2024 and availability of loan refinancing;

• valuation of investment properties and inventories;

• existence and ownership of investment properties and inventories;

• accounting treatment for taxes incurred in multiple jurisdictions;

• interest rates and inflation;

• income recognition for rental income; and

• progress on divestment.

The risks relating to going concern and viability are mitigated through ongoing management of cash resources, regular monitoring of compliance with loan covenants and re-negotiation with lender banks prior to loan maturities. Communications with major shareholders lend support to the Company's continuation.

The risk relating to the valuation of investment properties and inventories is mitigated through use of a professionally qualified independent valuer to conduct the valuations in accordance with current Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Appraisal and Valuation Standards.

The valuation is overseen by the Investment Adviser to ensure that the values are comparable to current market values of similar properties. The valuation process and methodology are discussed with the Investment Adviser regularly during the year and with the external auditor as part of the year-end audit planning. These valuations are reviewed, challenged and ultimately agreed by the Board, who possesses knowledge and understanding of the markets where the properties are situated. The Board ordinarily meets with the valuer at least once a year. The factors that affect the value and ownership of the investment property and inventory are further discussed in Notes 3, 6 and 7.

The risk relating to the ownership and existence of investment properties and inventories is mitigated through ensuring proper title deeds for the properties are held. Asset reconciliations are performed by the Administrator with the special purpose vehicle ("SPV") Administrator on a quarterly basis. Property searches showing ownership of each of the assets are conducted to ascertain that there are no changes in ownership.

The risk relating to taxation is mitigated through the setup of the Group structure. When taxation queries arise, an independent taxation adviser is employed to advise the Board on such issues. The factors that affect the Group's taxation position are further discussed in Note 9.

Meetings

The Audit and Risk Committee meets not less than twice a year and at such other times as the Chairman requires. Any member of the Audit and Risk Committee may request that a meeting be convened by the Company Secretary. The external auditor may request that a meeting be convened if they deem it necessary. Other Directors and third parties may be invited by the Audit and Risk Committee to attend meetings as and when appropriate.

Annual General Meeting

The Audit and Risk Committee Chairman, or other members of the Audit and Risk Committee appointed for the purpose, shall attend each AGM of the Company, prepared to respond to shareholders' questions on the Audit and Risk Committee's activities.

Risk management

The Company's risk assessment process and the way in which significant business risks are managed is a key area of focus for the Audit and Risk Committee. The work of the Audit and Risk Committee was driven primarily by the Company's assessment of its principal risks and uncertainties as set out in the Corporate Governance Report. The Audit and Risk Committee receives reports from the Investment Adviser and Administrator on the Company's risk evaluation process and reviews changes to the principal risks identified, including emerging risks.

Primary Area of Judgement

The Audit and Risk Committee determined that the key risk of misstatement of the Company's financial statements is the fair value of the investment property held by the Group in the context of the high degree of judgement involved in the assumptions and estimates underlying the discounted cash flow calculations and any resulting impairment.

As outlined in Note 6 of the financial statements, the fair value of the Group's investment property as at 30 June 2024 was US$97,970,000 (2023: US$141,045,000). The valuation process is initiated by the Investment Adviser who appoints a suitably qualified valuer to conduct the valuation of the investment property. The results are overseen by the Investment Adviser. Once satisfied with the valuations based on their expectations, the Investment Adviser reports the results to the Board. The Board reviews the latest valuation based on their knowledge of the property market and compares these to previous valuations. The Group's investment properties were revalued at 30 June 2024 by an independent, professionally-qualified valuer, Savills.

Savills is required to make assumptions on establishing the current market valuation. The most significant assumptions (as described further in Note 6), relate to future income streams and discount rates applicable to these estimates. The principal technique deployed was the income capitalisation method and these estimates are based on the local market conditions existing at the reporting date.

The valuation of the Group's investment property as at 30 June 2024 has been determined by the Board based upon the information provided by the Investment Adviser.

The properties accounted for as inventory under IFRS are recorded at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The Company also discloses an Adjusted NAV reporting what the Company's net asset value would be if the inventory were recognised at fair value (see Note 18) using the valuation prepared by Savills. As detailed above, Savills is required to make assumptions on establishing the current market valuation. The valuation of the Group's inventories at fair value for the purpose of the Adjusted NAV as at 30 June 2024 has been determined by the Board based upon the information provided by the Investment Adviser.

Internal audit

The Audit and Risk Committee considers at least once a year whether or not there is a need for an internal audit function. Currently, the Audit and Risk Committee does not consider there to be a need for an internal audit function, given that there are no employees in the Group and all outsourced functions are with parties/administrators who have their own internal controls and procedures. During the year, a SOC 1 report was produced for the Administrator, Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited. The Audit and Risk Committee also considers the review of controls of the service organisations.

External audit

Deloitte LLP have been appointed as external auditor for the year to 30 June 2024. The external auditor is required to rotate the audit partner every five years. The current Deloitte LLP lead audit partner, David Becker, started his tenure for the financial year ended 30 June 2021. The GFSC have indicated that no audit rotation requirements are applicable to a Guernsey company. Accordingly, paragraph 3.9 of the FCA guidance which cross refers to the requirement included in UK legislation, is not relevant for a Guernsey incorporated company.

During the year, the Audit and Risk Committee discussed the planning, conduct and conclusions of the external audit as it proceeded. At the May 2024 Audit and Risk Committee meeting, the Committee discussed and approved the external auditor's Group plan in which they identified the Group's going concern assumption, valuation of the investment property and carrying value of inventories as the key areas of risk of misstatement in the Group's financial statements.

The Audit and Risk Committee discussed these issues at the May 2024 meeting to ensure that appropriate arrangements are in place to mitigate these risks.

To fulfil its responsibility regarding the independence of the external auditor, the Audit and Risk Committee will consider:

• discussions with or reports from the external auditor describing its arrangements to identify, report and manage any conflicts of interest; and

• the extent of any non-audit services provided by the external auditor.

To assess the effectiveness of the external auditor, the Audit and Risk Committee will review:

• the external auditor's fulfilment of the agreed audit plan and variations from it;

• discussions or reports highlighting the major issues that arose during the course of the audit;

• feedback from other service providers evaluating the performance of the audit team;

• arrangements for ensuring independence and objectivity;

• the robustness of the external auditor in handling key accounting and audit judgements; especially with regard to the external auditor's review of the following areas:

o Valuation of investment property: the external auditor identified this as a key focus area of the audit and challenged the underlying assumptions used to prepare the valuation of the investment property by independent and professionally-qualified valuer, Savills, using their regional market specialists in Hong Kong and performed recalculations of assumptions to ensure they sat within their parameters.

o The going concern assumption: the external auditor held discussions with the Corporate Broker to understand any negative sentiment from investors around the upcoming continuation vote. In addition, the external auditor performed rigorous testing of management's cash flow forecasts and two-year viability period to obtain comfort over the going concern assumption. A material uncertainty paragraph has been included in the audit opinion in relation to going concern.

o Carrying value of inventory: Deloitte LLP performed an analysis of the cost of the properties classified as inventory against the valuation prepared by Savills and challenged the underlying assumptions that were used to prepare the valuations to ensure that these were appropriate.

The Audit and Risk Committee also held private meetings with the external auditor during 2024 and the Audit and Risk Committee Chairman also maintained regular contact with the audit partner throughout the year. These meetings provide an opportunity for open dialogue with the external auditor without management being present.

The Audit and Risk Committee is satisfied with Deloitte LLP's effectiveness and independence as the external auditor having considered the degree of diligence and professional scepticism demonstrated by them. Having carried out the review described above and having satisfied itself that the external auditor remains independent and effective, the Audit and Risk Committee has concluded that the external auditor implemented sufficiently robust processes to deliver a high quality audit. Accordingly, the Committee recommended to the Board that Deloitte LLP be reappointed as external auditor for the year ending 30 June 2025.

The Audit and Risk Committee has provided the Board with its recommendation to the shareholders on the re-appointment of Deloitte LLP as external auditor which will be put to shareholders at the AGM in December 2024.

Non-audit services

To safeguard the objectivity and independence of the external auditor from becoming compromised, the Audit and Risk Committee has a formal policy governing the engagement of the external auditor to provide non-audit services. This precludes Deloitte LLP from providing certain services, such as valuation work or the provision of accounting services, and also sets a presumption that Deloitte LLP should only be engaged for non-audit services where Deloitte LLP is best placed to provide the non-audit service. Please see Note 23 for details of services provided by Deloitte LLP.

Overview

The Audit and Risk Committee met four times in the year ended 30 June 2024. Matters considered at these meetings included but were not limited to:

• consideration and agreement of the terms of reference of the Audit and Risk Committee for approval by the Board;

• review of the accounting policies and format of the financial statements;

• review of the valuations of the properties held;

• review of the 2023 Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2023;

• review of the 2023 Interim Report and unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the 6 months ended 31 December 2023;

• review of the quarterly results announcements issued in November 2023 and May 2024;

• review of the audit plan and timetable for the preparation of the 2024 Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements;

• challenge of the 2024 Annual Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2024;

• discussions and recommendation regarding the appointment of the external auditor;

• discussions and approval of the fee for the external audit;

• assessment of the effectiveness of the external audit process as described above; and

• review of the Company's principal risks, emerging risks and internal controls.

As a result of its work during the year, the Audit and Risk Committee has concluded that it has acted in accordance with its terms of reference and has ensured the independence and objectivity of the external auditor. The Audit and Risk Committee has recommended to the Board that the Annual Report and Financial Statements are considered to be fair, balanced and understandable. The Audit and Risk Committee has recommended to the Board that the external auditor is re-appointed.

On behalf of the Audit and Risk Committee

Alan Clifton

Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee

27 September 2024

Statement of Directors' Responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and accounts in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. The Directors prepare the Group's financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as approved by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IFRS"). Under Company Law, the Directors must not approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the financial performance and cash flows of the Group for that period. In preparing these Group's financial statements, the Directors are required to:

• properly select and apply accounting policies;

• present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;

• provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity's financial position and financial performance; and

• make an assessment of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Directors confirm that they have complied with the above requirements in preparing the Group's financial statements.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy, at any time, the financial position of the Group and which enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and, hence, for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The maintenance and integrity of the Company's website (www.mpofund.com) is delegated to the Manager but is ultimately the responsibility of the Directors. The work carried out by the external auditor does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the external auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website.

Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

All companies who are a part of the Equity Shares in Commercial Companies ("ESCC") category in the UK are required under the UK Listing Rules to report on how they have applied the UK Code in their annual report and financial statements.

Responsibility Statement of the Directors in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts

Each of the Directors, whose names are set out above, confirms that, to the best of their knowledge and belief that:

Directors' statement under the Disclosure, Guidance and Transparency Rules

• The Group's financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole.

• The management report, which is incorporated into the Directors' Report, Manager's Report and Chairman's Message contained in the Annual Report, includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and of the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties they face.

Directors' statement under the UK Corporate Governance Code

• The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Group's financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Having taken advice from the Audit and Risk Committee, the Directors consider the Annual Report and Group's Financial Statements, taken as a whole, as fair, balanced and understandable and that it provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's performance, business model and strategy.

So far as each Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's external auditor is unaware, and each Director has taken all the steps that he ought to have taken as a Director in order to make himself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's external auditor is aware of that information. This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of section 249 of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended).

On behalf of the Board

Mark Huntley

Chairman of the Board

27 September 2024

Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of

Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited

Report on the audit of the financial statements

1.  Opinion

In our opinion the financial statements of Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited (the "Company"/"Fund") and its subsidiaries (the "Group"):

• give a true and fair view of the state of the Group's affairs as at 30 June 2024 and of its loss for the year then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB);

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.

We have audited the financial statements which comprise:

• the consolidated statement of financial position;

• the consolidated statement of comprehensive income;

• the consolidated statement of changes in equity;

• the consolidated cash flow statement; and

• the related notes 1 to 25

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB.

2.  Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report.

We are independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the Financial Reporting Council's (the "FRC's") Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We confirm that we have not provided any non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard to the Group.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

3.  Material uncertainty related to going concern

We draw attention to note 1 in the financial statements which indicates that the Group has major debt obligations that fall due within 12 months of the date of approval of the financial statements, for which refinancing has not yet been formally agreed. Also, the Fund's life is due to expire in December 2024 and whilst the Company will put forward a resolution for its continuation at the next annual general meeting, the continuation vote has not been passed at the date of approval of the financial statements. As stated in note 1, these events or conditions, along with the other matters as set forth in note 1 indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group's and Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the Group's and Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:

• Evaluating management's assessment of the potential issues that may give rise to a material uncertainty, including mitigating actions identified by the directors;

• Considering the financial covenants currently in place and whether sufficient headroom exists, particularly in the context of decreased property valuations and the impact of the current macro-economic environment including high interest rates;

• Evaluating the likelihood of renewal of external financing arrangements at expiry, including consideration of history of renewal of such arrangements;

• Evaluating the assumption made by the directors related to passing of the upcoming continuation vote for the extension of the life of the Company;

• Performing sensitivity analysis on the key assumptions and inputs applied in the going concern assessment and cashflow model, including the ability to sell the remaining properties given the slow recovery of real estate market sector;

• Assessing the reasonability of key assumptions in the cashflow model and obtaining supporting documentation from management; and

• Evaluating the appropriateness of the disclosures in the financial statements.

In relation to the reporting on how the Group has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

4.  Summary of our audit approach

5.  Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team.

These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

In addition to the matter described in the material uncertainty related to going concern section, we have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.

5.1  Key judgements in the valuation of investment property

5.2. Carrying value of inventory

6.  Our application of materiality

6.1. Materiality

We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the financial statements that makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or influenced. We use materiality both in planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

6.2. Performance materiality

We set performance materiality at a level lower than materiality to reduce the probability that, in aggregate, uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceed the materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Group performance materiality was set at 70% of Group materiality for the 2024 audit (2023: 70%). In determining performance materiality, we considered the following factors:

• Our risk assessment, including our assessment of the quality of the control environment including that present at the administrator, Ocorian Administration (Guernsey) Limited;

• Our past experience of the audit, which has indicated a low number of corrected and uncorrected misstatements identified in prior period;

• The continued impact of macro - economic factors in Macau on the Group's performance in the current year.

6.3  Error reporting threshold

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of $23k (2023: $32k), as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that we identified when assessing the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7.  An overview of the scope of our audit

7.1. Scoping

Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement for the Company and its subsidiaries. Audit work to respond to the risks of material misstatement was performed directly by the Group audit team and all work was performed to Group materiality.

7.2. Our consideration of the control environment

We obtained an understanding of the IT systems in place.

In assessing the control environment, we also considered the control environments of the key service providers, including the administrators, to whom the board have delegated certain functions for the Company and its subsidiaries. As part of our audit, we obtained an understanding of relevant controls established at the key service providers including obtaining the ISAE 3402 report.

We tested relevant controls over investment properties and inventory valuation.

7.3. Our consideration of climate-related risks

In planning our audit, we have considered the potential impact of environmental related risks on the Group's business and its financial statements.

The Group continues to develop its assessment of the impacts of environmental, social and governance ("ESG") related risks as outlined above. The Group evaluated the impact arising from climate change on the financial statements and concluded that there is no material effect.

As a part of our audit, we have obtained management's ESG policy and held discussions with management to understand the process of identifying ESG related risks, the determination of mitigating actions and the impact on the Group's financial statements. We performed our own qualitative risk assessment of the climate impact and concur with management assessment. We also considered the consistency of the ESG disclosure set up above with the financial statements and our knowledge from our audit.

8.  Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

9.  Responsibilities of directors

As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

10. Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.

11. Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.

11.1.     Identifying and assessing potential risks related to irregularities

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, we considered the following:

• the nature of the industry and sector, control environment and business performance including the design of the Group's remuneration policies, key drivers for directors' remuneration, bonus levels and performance targets;

• results of our enquiries of management, the directors and the Audit Committee about their own identification and assessment of the risks of irregularities including those that are specific to the Group's sector;

• any matters we identified having obtained and reviewed the Group's documentation of their policies and procedures relating to:

o identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances of non-compliance;

o detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud;

o the internal controls established to mitigate risks of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations;

• the matters discussed among the audit engagement team and relevant internal specialists, including valuation specialists regarding how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements and any potential indicators of fraud.

As a result of these procedures, we considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the organisation for fraud and identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following areas:

• Key judgements in the valuation of investment property; and

• Carrying value of inventory

In common with all audits under ISAs (UK), we are also required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override.

We also obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework that the Group operates in, focusing on provisions of those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The key laws and regulations we considered in this context included the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, the Listing Rules and relevant tax legislation.

In addition, we considered provisions of other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the financial statements but compliance with which may be fundamental to the Group's ability to operate or to avoid a material penalty.

11.2.     Audit response to risks identified

As a result of performing the above, we identified the key judgements in the valuation of investment property and carrying value of inventory as key audit matters related to the potential risk of fraud. The key audit matters section of our report explains the matters in more detail and also describes the specific procedures we performed in response to those key audit matters.

In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:

• reviewing the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with provisions of relevant laws and regulations described as having a direct effect on the financial statements;

• enquiring of management and the Audit Committee concerning actual and potential litigation and claims;

• performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud;

• reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance, reviewing internal audit reports and reviewing correspondence with the Guernsey Financial Services Commission; and

• in addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, testing the appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments; assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.

We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members including internal specialists, and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

12. Corporate Governance Statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Group's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

• the directors' statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified;

• the directors' explanation as to its assessment of the Group's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate;

• the directors' statement on fair, balanced and understandable;

• the board's confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;

• the section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and

• the section describing the work of the audit committee.

13. Matters on which we are required to report by exception

13.1.     Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records

Under the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

• proper accounting records have not been kept [by the parent company]; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records.

We have nothing to report in respect of these matters.

14. Other matters which we are required to address

14.1. Auditor tenure

Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Audit Committee to audit the financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2021 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is 4 years, covering the years ending 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2024.

14.2. Consistency of the audit report with the additional report to the audit committee

Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee we are required to provide in accordance with ISAs (UK).

15. Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Section 262 of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

As required by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule (DTR) 4.1.15R - DTR 4.1.18R, these financial statements will form part of the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the FCA in accordance with DTR 4.1.15R - DTR 4.1.18R. This auditor's report provides no assurance over whether the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report has been prepared in compliance with DTR 4.1.15R - DTR 4.1.18R.

David Becker (Senior Statutory Auditor)

For and on behalf of Deloitte LLP

Recognised Auditor

St Peter Port, Guernsey

28 September 2024

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

As at 30 June 2024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Consolidated Financial Statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 27 September 2024.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Year ended 30 June 2024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

All items in the above statement are derived from continuing operations.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Year ended 30 June 2024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Year ended 30 June 2024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

General information

Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited (the "Company") is a Company incorporated and registered in Guernsey under The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 1994. This law was replaced by the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 on 1 July 2008. The Company is an authorised entity under the Authorised Closed-Ended Investment Schemes Rules and Guidance, 2021 and is regulated by the GFSC. The address of the registered office is given below.

The Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2024 comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the "Group"). The Group has investments in residential property in Macau.

These Consolidated Financial Statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 27 September 2024.

1   Summary of significant accounting policies

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented, unless otherwise stated.

Statement of compliance

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), which comprise standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board, together with applicable legal and regulatory requirements of Guernsey Law and the GFSC.

Basis of preparation

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS; applicable legal and regulatory requirements of Guernsey Law and under the historical cost basis, except for investment properties that have been measured at fair value. All other assets and liabilities are carried at amortised cost.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in Note 3. The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in US Dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand ($'000), except where otherwise indicated.

Going concern

The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, are set out in the Manager's Report. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and its liquidity position are described in the Capital Management section of the Manager's Report.

The financial risk management objectives and policies of the Group and the exposure of the Group to credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In accordance with provision 30 of the 2018 revision of the UK Corporate Governance Code, (the "UK Code"), and as a fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, the Directors have assessed as to whether the Company will continue in existence as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from signing of the financial statements, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis for the reasons set out below and as the Directors, with recommendation from the Audit and Risk Committee, have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the next twelve months after date of approval of the Annual Report.

In reaching its conclusion, the Board have considered the risks that could impact the Group's liquidity over the period to 30 September 2025. This period represents the period of at least 12 months from the date of signing of the Annual Report.

As part of their assessment the Audit and Risk Committee highlighted the following key considerations:

1. Whether the Group can repay or refinance its loan facilities to discharge its liabilities over the period to 30 September 2025

2. Extension of life of the Company

1.   Whether the Group can repay or refinance its loan facilities to discharge its liabilities over the period to 30 September 2025

As at 30 June 2024, the Group has major debt obligations to settle during the going concern period being:

i)   principal repayments for The Waterside loan facility of US$11.5 million, US$16.0 million and US$39.8 million due for settlement in September 2024, March 2025 and September 2025, respectively;

ii)   principal repayments for The Fountainside loan facility of US$0.7 million due for settlement in December 2024;

iii)  principal repayments for the Penha Heights Tai Fung Bank loan facility of US$2.2 million due for settlement in two instalments of US$0.65 million each in September 2024 and December 2024 and three instalments of US$0.3 million each thereafter in March 2025, June 2025 and September 2025, respectively; and

iv)   principal repayments for the Penha Heights BCM loan facility of US$0.4 million, US$0.4 million and US$6.9 million due for settlement in March 2025, June 2025 and September 2025, respectively.

The Waterside and The Fountainside

Given that the Macau Special Administrative Region Government have now revoked all the property cooling measures which had been in place for 3 years and the current staggered Macau economic recovery, it is assumed that MPO can achieve a rate of 2 Waterside unit disposals per month from August 2024 to September 2025. This would generate US$79.5 million of revenue referenced to current valuations and pricing strategy which would be sufficient to cover the instalments for both the Waterside and Fountainside facilities due for repayment in the upcoming twelve months period as well as MPO's operating expenses.

Loan repayments to Hang Seng Bank for the Waterside facilities in September 2024 of US$11.5 million, was settled through disposal proceeds from the Waterside units. In addition, an advance payment of US$1.7 million loan amount has also been prepaid to Hang Seng Bank in September 2024.

Penha Heights

The loan repayments for the two Penha Heights facilities that would become due over the going concern period total US$9.9 million. It is anticipated that this would be settled from sales proceeds of Waterside and Fountainside units, in the event that Penha Heights is not disposed of during the period.

Penha Heights loan repayment of US$0.65 million has been settled in accordance to loan repayment term in September 2024.

Relationship with Lenders

The Manager is responsible for maintaining relationship with the Group's lenders, for monitoring compliance with loan terms and covenants and reporting to the Board on matters arising. Throughout the year ended 30 June 2024 and up to the date of issue of the financial statements, the Group has continued to be in compliance with loan covenants and the Manager has maintained frequent ongoing dialogue with all lenders who have demonstrated strong support for the Group and its measured divestment strategy over the years.

Given the debt obligations that will become due for settlement over the going concern period are expected to be covered by proceeds from selling Waterside units at a conservative modest rate and potential sales of Fountainside units. The fact that all banking facilities of the Group have all been successfully renewed previously, with the loan-to-value ratios of the facilities maintained within the covenants required under the respective loan agreements, the Board is confident that the Group would be able to meet its debt obligations during the going concern period.

Notwithstanding the above, given that it remains uncertain that adequate proceeds could be generated from sales of properties to settle payment obligations over the going concern period, and given that any necessary refinancing of debt obligations would still be subjected to lenders' approval, the Directors consider that there is a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt over the Group's and Company's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.

2.   Extension of life of the Company

After the Ordinary Resolution was passed at the Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of the Company in its 2023 AGM to extend the Fund's life until the 2024 AGM (expected to be held by December 2024), the Directors assessed the impact of the continuation vote on the Fund's ability to continue as a going concern. The Directors have also considered the going concern assumption outside the primary going concern horizon. In line with Article 38 of the Articles of Incorporation, the Company will put forward a resolution for its continuation at the next AGM (to be held by December 2024). If any continuation resolution is not passed, the Directors are required to formulate proposals to be put to Members to reorganise, unitise, reconstruct or wind up the Company. The Directors expect to receive continuation support from major shareholders based upon ongoing communications and note that 50% of shareholder support is required to ensure continuation. It is likely that returns from the sale of properties would be significantly lower, as endorsed by the recent forced sales imposed on developers, if the Fund was forced to sell as a result of a failed continuation vote from shareholders and it is therefore commercially sensible for the Fund to continue in business. Given that the continuation vote has not taken place at the date of issue of the financial statements, the Directors consider that there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.

Going Concern Conclusion

After careful consideration and based on the reasons outlined above, including the Manager's continuing dialogue with lenders and shareholders, whilst there are material uncertainties related to going concern, the Board have a reasonable expectation that the Company will continue in existence as a going concern for 12 months from the date of signing the Annual report. They are therefore satisfied that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

New and amended standards and interpretations applied

The following amendments to existing standards and interpretations were effective for the year ended 30 June 2024 and therefore were applied in the current year but they did not have a material impact on the Group:

-    IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts

-    Amendments to IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts

-    Amendments to IAS 8: Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors

-    Amendments to IAS 12: Income Taxes

-    Amendments to IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements

New and amended standard and interpretation not applied

The following new and amended standards and interpretations in issue are applicable to the Group but are not yet effective and have not been adopted by the Group:

-    Amendments to IFRS 7: Financial Instruments: Disclosures (effective 1 January 2024)

-    Amendments to IAS 1: Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (effective 1 January 2024)

-    Amendments to IAS 1: Classification of debt with covenants (effective 1 January 2024)

-    Amendments to IFRS 16: Leases (effective 1 January 2024)

-    Amendments to IAS 7: Statement of Cash Flows (effective 1 January 2024)

Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and all SPVs controlled by the Company and its subsidiaries. Control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date control commences until the date control ceases. Certain of the Company's subsidiaries have non-coterminous year-ends. These companies are consolidated on the basis of actual transactions occurring within the financial year.

All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.

Segment reporting

A business segment is a group of assets and operations engaged in providing products or services that are subject to risks and returns different from those of other business segments. A geographical segment is engaged in providing products or services within a particular economic environment that are subject to risks and returns different from those segments operating in other economic environments.

The Directors are of the opinion that the Group is engaged in a single segment of business, being property investment and related business. This segment includes residential properties in Macau. Please refer to Note 5 for segment reporting.

Foreign currency translation

a)   Presentation and functional currency

The Consolidated Financial Statements are shown in US Dollars ("US$") which is the Group's presentation currency. The Group's functional currency is Hong Kong Dollars ("HKD").

b)   Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the respective functional currencies of group entities, Macanese Patacas and Hong Kong Dollars (the "functional currencies"), using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses - resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date of the initial transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined. The gain or loss arising on translation of non-monetary items measured at fair value is treated in line with the recognition of gain or loss on change in fair value of the item (i.e. translation differences on items whose fair value gain or loss is recognised in other comprehensive income or profit or loss are also recognised in other comprehensive income or profit or loss).

c)   Group companies

The results and financial position of all the Group entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

i)   assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;

ii)  income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates;

iii) all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of other comprehensive income; and

iv)  on disposal of a foreign operation, the component of other comprehensive income relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in profit or loss.

Foreign currency translation reserve

Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations into the Group's presentation currency are recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the foreign currency translation reserve in equity.

Investment property

Property that is held for long-term rental yields or for capital appreciation or both, and that is not occupied by companies in the consolidated Group, is classified as investment property. Investment property also includes property that is being constructed or developed for future use as investment property.

Investment property is measured initially at its cost, including related transaction costs.

Subsequent expenditure is capitalised to the asset's carrying amount only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance costs are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income during the financial period in which they are incurred. After initial recognition, investment property is carried at fair value.

The Group must be able to access the principal or the most advantageous market at the measurement date. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.

There are no contractual obligations to purchase, construct or develop investment property for repairs, maintenance or enhancements.

An investment property is derecognised upon disposal or when the investment property is permanently withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from the disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the property (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss in the period in which the property is derecognised.

Fair value measurements

The Group measures certain financial instruments, and non-financial assets such as investment property, at fair value at the end of each reporting period.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:

• in the principal market for the asset or liability; or

• in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use, or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.

The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:

For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Group determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period.

Fair value of investment property

Fair value is based on active market prices, adjusted, if necessary, for any difference in the nature, location or condition of the specific investment property. If this information is not available, the Group uses alternative valuation methods such as recent prices on less active markets or discounted cash flow projections. Valuations are prepared semi-annually by Savills (Macau) Limited ("Savills"), whose valuers hold recognised and relevant professional qualifications and have recent experience in the location and category of the investment properties being valued. Investment property that is being redeveloped for continuing use as investment property continues to be measured at fair value, if the fair value is considered to be reliably measurable. Changes in fair values are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Inventories

Properties and land that are being held or developed for future sale are classified as inventories. In the opinion of the Board, inventories are held with a view to short term sale in the ordinary course of business. They are individually carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value ("NRV"). NRV is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less costs to complete redevelopment and selling expenses. Cost is the acquisition cost together with subsequent capital expenditure incurred, including capitalised interest where relevant.

Disposals

Disposals are recognised when the risks and rewards of ownership of an asset transfer to the purchaser.

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs incurred for the purpose of acquiring, constructing or producing a qualifying asset, such as investment property or inventory, are capitalised as part of the cost. Borrowing costs are capitalised while the acquisition or construction is actively underway, and cease once the asset is substantially complete, or suspended if the development is suspended. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds. The interest capitalised is calculated using the Group's weighted average cost of borrowing after adjusting for borrowing associated with specific developments. Where borrowings are associated with specific developments, the amount capitalised is the gross interest incurred on those borrowings less any investment income arising from their temporary investment.

Impairment

Financial assets

The Group holds only other receivables with no financing component and which have maturities of less than 12 months at amortised cost and deposits with lenders which represent restricted cash in relation to borrowing. The liquidity of this deposit with lenders follow the maturity of the borrowings. As such, the Group has chosen to apply an approach similar to the simplified approach for Expected Credit Losses (ECL) under IFRS 9 to all its other receivables. Therefore, the Group does not track changes in credit risk, but instead, recognises a loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date.

The Group's approach to ECLs reflects a probability-weighted outcome, the time value of money and reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.

The Group uses the provision matrix as a practical expedient to measuring ECLs on other receivables and deposits with lenders, based on days past due for groupings of receivables with similar loss patterns. Receivables are grouped based on their nature. The provision matrix is based on historical observed loss rates over the expected life of the receivables and is adjusted for forward-looking estimates.

Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group's non-financial assets, other than investment property are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell.

Leases

Leases in which the Group does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership to a lessee are classified as operating leases. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognised over the term of the lease on the same basis as rental income. Contingent rents are recognised as revenue in the period in which they are earned. The Group regularly reviews and assesses the risk associated with the leases of the underlying assets.

Financial instruments

i)   Classification

Financial assets

The Group classifies its financial assets as subsequently measured at amortised cost or measured at fair value through profit or loss on the basis of both:

• The entity's business model for managing the financial assets

• The contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets

Financial assets measured at amortised cost

Deposits with lenders and other receivables are measured at amortised cost if it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows and its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost

This category includes all financial liabilities, other than those measured at FVPL. The Group includes in this category interest-bearing loans and trade and other payables.

ii)  Recognition

The Group recognises a financial asset or a financial liability when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the time frame generally established by regulation or convention in the market place (regular way trades) are recognised on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Group commits to purchase or sell the assets.

iii) Initial measurement

Financial assets and liabilities (other than those classified as at FVPL) are measured initially at their fair value plus any directly attributable incremental costs of acquisition or issue.

iv)  Subsequent measurement

After initial measurement, the Company's deposits with lenders and other receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any allowance for impairment. There has been no impairment in either the current or prior year. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the deposits with lenders and other receivables are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.

Financial liabilities, other than those classified as at FVPL, are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the amortisation process.

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating and recognising the interest income or interest expense in profit or loss over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial asset or financial liability to the gross carrying amount of the financial asset or to the amortised cost of the financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Group estimates cash flows considering all contractual terms of the financial instruments, but does not consider ECL. The calculation includes all fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts.

Deposits with lenders

Deposits with lenders comprise cash held at bank that is pledged for loan covenants and are recognised as current and non-current assets.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position comprise cash at bank and on hand and demand deposits with an original maturity of three months or less and other short-term, highly-liquid investments that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. For the purpose of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above. Deposits with lenders are excluded and not considered cash and cash equivalents.

Share capital

Shares are classified as equity when there is no obligation to transfer cash or other assets. Shares issued by the Company are recorded based upon the proceeds received, net of incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is measured based on the consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in a contract with the customers, and includes rental income and income from property trading. Revenue from sales of completed properties and properties under development is within the scope of IFRS 15 and revenue from rental income is within the scope of IFRS 16. There are no significant assumptions or judgements involved in revenue recognition.

The Group earns revenue from acting as lessor in operating leases which do not transfer substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an investment property. No subleases are currently held.

Rental income

Rental income from operating leases is recognised as income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. When the Group provides incentives to its customers, the cost of incentives is recognised over the lease term, on a straight-line basis, as a reduction of rental income.

For investment property held primarily to earn rental income, the Group enters as a lessor into lease agreements that fall within scope of IFRS 16.

Sale of completed property

Revenue from sale of completed properties is recognised when effective control of ownership of the properties is transferred to the buyer, which is on unconditional exchange of contracts and change of title on the property. Where the sales contract stipulates payments that cross over reporting period, revenue is recognised over the period of the contract by reference to the progress towards complete satisfaction of each performance obligation. This is determined based on the actual cost incurred to date to estimated total cost for each contract. The proceeds from disposal are recognised in income and net assets disposed of are recognised in cost of sales in expenses.

Sale of property under development

Where property is under development and an agreement has been reached to sell such property when construction is complete, and where the Directors determine the pre-sale to constitute the sale of a completed property, revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the real estate have been transferred to the buyer, which is on the unconditional exchange of contracts and change of title on the property. Where the sales contract stipulates payments that cross over reporting periods, revenue is recognised as the satisfaction of performance obligations is completed.

Sale of subsidiary

Revenue from the sale of a subsidiary is recognised when effective control of ownership of the subsidiary is transferred to the buyer. The sale of the subsidiary is regarded as a loss of control under IFRS 10 with all assets and liabilities of the subsidiary derecognised at the date control is lost, the fair value of the consideration received from the transaction compared to the net assets of the subsidiary and the resulting net income or expense of the transaction recorded in the income statement.

Borrowings

Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs of the loan to the extent that it is probable that some or all of the facility will be drawn down and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Borrowings are classified as current liabilities, unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the date of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Offsetting

Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the statement of financial position if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and to settle the liabilities simultaneously.

Finance income and expenses

Interest income is recognised using the effective interest rate method in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Finance costs comprise interest expense on borrowings. Interest expense is recognised using the effective interest rate method in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Distributable reserves

Distributable reserves may be legally paid out in the form of a dividend. Payments to shareholders from reserves can be seen as a distribution of accumulated profit. In accordance with the Listing Prospectus and under Guernsey law, on 7 June 2006 an application was made to the Royal Court of Guernsey to have the share premium cancelled and re-designated as a distributable reserve.

Foreign currency translation reserve

The foreign currency translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations.

Taxes

Current income tax

Current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Current income tax relating to items recognised directly in equity is recognised in equity and not in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax

Deferred income tax is provided using the liability method on all temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences, carried forward tax credits or tax losses can be utilised.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Deferred income tax relating to items recognised directly in equity is recognised in equity and not in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

As a result of the discussion of the IFRS Interpretations Committee in its July 2014 meeting relating to deferred taxation for a single asset held by a corporate wrapper, the Group has recognised the deferred tax liability for the taxable temporary timing difference relating to the investment property carried at fair value.

2.  Financial risk management, policies and objectives

The Group's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including foreign exchange risk, cash flow and fair value interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.

The Board of Directors provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as written policies covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk.

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in market prices, whether caused by factors specific to an individual financial instrument or all factors affecting all financial instruments traded in the market including foreign exchange risk, equity price risk and cash flow and fair value interest rate risk as detailed below.

The Group's market risk is managed by the Manager in accordance with policies and procedures in place. The Group's overall market position is monitored on a quarterly basis by the Board of Directors.

Sensitivities to market risks included below are based on a change in one factor while holding all other factors constant. In practice, this is unlikely to occur and changes in some of the factors may be correlated, for example, changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency rates.

a)   Foreign exchange risk

The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised monetary assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations. The Group's policy is not to enter into any currency hedging transactions. The tables below summarise the Group's exposure to foreign currency risk as at 30 June 2024 and 30 June 2023. The Group's financial assets and liabilities are included in the table, categorised by their currency at their carrying amount in US$'000. In the current economic climate, management's assessment of a reasonable possible change in foreign exchange rates would be up to a 1% increase/decrease for Hong Kong Dollar ("HK$")/US$, due to the HK$ being pegged to the US$, and up to a 10% increase/decrease for all other currencies.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies held by the Group as at 30 June 2024 and 30 June 2023, and can be used to monitor foreign currency risk as at that date.

At 30 June 2024, if Sterling weakened/strengthened by 10% against US$ with all other variables held constant, the loss for the year would have been US$26,000 lower/higher (2023: US$27,000 lower/higher). The HK$ is pegged to the US$ with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority pledging to keep the exchange rate within a trading band of 5 Hong Kong cents either side of HK$7.80 per dollar. At present the rate is HK$7.81 per dollar so no downward risk while the currency peg remains in place. The foreign exchange risk is considered minimal and as such the Company does not actively manage against this risk. If the HK$ weakened/strengthened by 1% against the US$ with all other variables held constant, the net assets and movement in foreign currency translation reserve would have been US$809,000 higher/lower (2023: US$1,009,000 higher/lower). Any movement would have no other effect on the remaining equity components of the Group. There are no material transactions that would have effect on the profit/loss for the year.

The Macanese Patacas ("MOP") is fixed to the HK$ at a rate of MOP:HK$ of 1.03. Due to the low level of assets held in this currency, a 10% change in rate would not have a significant effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As the HK$ is pegged to the US$ and the MOP is fixed to the US$ the foreign exchange risk of these currencies is considered minimal as under the normal course of business the Group has minor exposure to other currencies.

Movements in other currencies would not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

b)   Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk

The Group's interest rate risk is managed by the Manager, in accordance with policies and procedures in place, and can be mitigated through the use of interest rate swaps. The Group only has exposure to floating interest rates as at 30 June 2024. The Manager has assessed the interest rate risk as not being significant enough to warrant management through the use of interest rate swaps during either the current or prior years. The Group's overall positions and exposures are monitored on a quarterly basis by the Board of Directors.

If interest rates had been 500 bps higher/lower and all other variables were held constant, the Group's loss for the year would have increased/decreased by US$3,895,000 (2023: loss for the year increased/decreased by US$4,945,000 (based on the interest bearing net financial liability per the table below). This is mainly due to the Group's exposure to interest-bearing loans.

The following table details the Group's exposure to floating interest rates: