Goldman Sachs takes massive hit from difficult markets, volatility in Q1
Goldman's beats on EPS, revenues miss
Average daily VaR edges higher versus Q4, drops versus Q1 2015
Net revenues in FICC hardest hit, debt underwriting does well
Goldman references difficult conditions for market-making
Goldman Sachs's sales and profits took a massive hit in the first three months of the year as the venerable Wall Street firm was impacted by difficult conditions for market-making at its key trading unit – known by the acronym FICC - and volatility in equities.
Dow Jones I.A.
43,750.86
04:30 15/10/20
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
n/a
n/a
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
$241.87
11:10 14/11/24
Morgan Stanley
$132.43
11:10 14/11/24
Quarterly net income collapsed by 60% in comparison to a year ago, hitting $1.135bn, as revenues shrank 40% to $6.338bn.
Significantly, the bank's earnings took a hit despite having opted to pull back on ‘risk-taking’ during the quarter in comparison to a year ago, as reflected in a decline in its average daily value-at-risk (VaR), although it was still far higher than some of its rivals.
The drop in earnings came despite actions by management to slash operating expenses by 29% to $4.76bn.
A widely-followed ratio of compensation and benefits to net revenues for the first quarter of 2016 was 42.0%, unchanged compared with the first quarter of 2015.
Earnings per share printed at $2.68, in comparison with the $5.94 achieved in the same period of last year and the $1.27 seen in the final three months of 2015.
Analysts had been expecting the New York-based firm to report revenues of $6.73bn and EPS of $2.45.
FICC revenues hardest hit, alongside lower VaR
Net revenues at its Institutional Client Services unit were hardest hit, falling 37% to $3.44bn.
Within that unit, net revenues from Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities client execution did worst, falling 47% to $1.66bn.
“FICC operated in a challenging environment characterized by economic uncertainty and difficult market-making conditions, which resulted in significantly lower net revenues across all major businesses compared with the first quarter of 2015,” the bank said in a statement.
Net revenues from Equities were down by 23% to $1.78bn as a result of the heightened economic uncertainty and volatility.
However, Goldman’s average daily value-at-risk (VaR) – one popular metric for many Wall Street analysts trying to gauge the riskiness of a bank’s earnings – declined rom $81m in the first quarter of 2015 to $72m as of 31 March 2016.
In the last quarter of 2015 Goldman's VaR stood at $71m.
Nonetheless, that was still significantly greater than Morgan Stanley’s first quarter average trading Value-at-Risk (VaR), of $46m, down from $47m one year ago. No equivalent figure was included in JP Morgan Chase's latest results statement.
Re-opening of debt markets benefit IB unit
Investment banking revenues also declined 23.0% to $1.46bn versus a year ago, driven by falling revenues from financial advisory and underwriting, although revenues from debt underwriting improved significantly - primarily reflecting an increase in investment-grade activity - Goldman said.
The firm highlighted how its assets under supervision jumped to a record $1.29trn after net inflows of $26bn for the three month period, including net inflows of $10bn in long-term assets under supervision.
The bank’s return on shareholders’ equity rose to 6.4%.
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was at 13.4% as of quarter end, down from the 13.6% achieved in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Goldman’s effective tax rate in the first quarter was 28.0%, below the full-year rate of 30.7% seen in 2015.
To take note of, going into Tuesday's results announcement Goldman Sachs's shares had under-performed the KBW Bank index year-to-date.
As of 13:02 BST shares in in Goldman Sachs were down 0.33% to $158.50.